Thursday, May 15, 2008

Wine Musings Vol#55


Wine of Merit: ****Castello dei Rampolla, Sammarco, Toscana, Rosso, 1997: A tale of two wines. At first this cab based Italian is decidedly international in style – blind I would have guessed California merlot. Lovely, velvety red fruit, lavender, chocolate…a full coating palate with more yummy red fruit, licorice, chalk and cafĂ© au lait…just delicious…but somehow a bit of a recipe wine. Amazingly with time, this wine changes completely. Two hours in and this wine introduces strawberry rhubarb, baking spices, soaped saddle leather, a touch racy, great minerality…now that’s Italian! Interesting how the cab works as a back drop – maybe more of a structural support platform - for the two other elements (Merlot and Sangiovese) that are actually very much in the minority in this wine. A real treat!

***++La Spinetta, Pin, Monferrato, Rosso, 1999: Masculine and sophisticated. This is still a very big wine, with I am sure decades of longevity left. It is however also balanced and nicely integrated, and thus wonderful to drink right now. Deep, thick blue fruit, some pine and lots of minerals on the brooding nose, this wine exhibits predominantly Nebbiolo characteristics up front. Palate coating, firmly tannic and evidencing integrated medium toast new French oak, the body is almost more Bordeaux than traditional Piemontese. With time, the Nebbiolo surrenders to at least an integrated element of the Barbera, introducing more traditional Italian red fruit and smoke. An extremely well crafted wine that I will continue to cellar with enthusiasm – and at under $50 an amazing buy.

***+Talty, Talty Vineyards, Dry Creek Valley, zinfandel, 2004: Talty is tasty! This was a new winery for me – and a welcomed introduction to be sure. This wine is all about freshness – one whiff and I can close my eyes and be transported directly to the Dry Creek, barrel sampling at a number of my favorite wineries up on Dry Creek Road. Very, very berry driven, this wine is laden with fresh fruit, herbs and minerals and packs a wallop of black pepper to go with (I understand there is a decent dose of Petite Sirah in here – I can taste it). Not overripe or hot at all, it is really about the freshness and a very light hand in the winemaking process. While my zin collection has dwindled down to a select few producers (Doug Nalle being chief among them) – this Talty wine gives me confidence to go back and see what else might be going on out there. Just delicious!

***Matanzas Creek, Sonoma County, merlot, 1990: Wonderful, mature Sonoma merlot. Made back in the day when this label was truly representative of the best merlot made in California. Deep, deep, perfumed black fruits, a touch of soy, spice box and church incense, including a hint of the lavender this estate has become so noted for. Thinning a bit mid palate, it still shows great black/red fruit and liquid minerals. The finish is still surprisingly firm if fine and sweet. Dynamite wine. Give it some air and drink up.

Friday, April 25, 2008

Wine Musings Vol#54


Wine of Merit: ***Covenant, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 2004: While this is not the best wine I have had over the past month, it is very much a wine of merit. Why? Because it aspires to be not only a great kosher for Passover wine, but a great wine period. Sourced from larkmead fruit, this wine cuts no corners. Juicy, ripe black currant fruit-driven style, this wine also exhibits nice cassis, grilled meats and lavender notes. It is lavishly oaked - perhaps a bit too for my palate, bringing with it almond / vanilla notes and baker's spices. The palate is full and coating but also firm with very good length. This young wine should have ample cellar life ahead of it. Of course the $90 a pop asking price pre-supposes at the very least this level of quality - good to see that it delivers. Also wins the all label award!

***++Chateau Ducru Beaucalliou, St. Julien, Bordeaux, 1998: I have posted previously on this wine. Notes remain consistent. Dynamite, St. Julien nose of iodine, camphor, herbs, red and black fruit, tobacco. Velvety palate but with plenty of depth and length. A wine to enjoy now decanted or let rest for awhile still. Top Notch.

***+Rivers Marie, Occidental Ridge vineyard, Sonoma Coast, pinot noir, 2006: Lovely. Very Sonoma coast. Deep, deep dark black cherry fruit, forest floor, rosemary, mulling spices. A singularly focused element of blood orange that becomes more pronounced as the wine opens. Beautiful balance – a big wine with plenty of backbone. Serious.

***+Chateau D’Yquem, Lur Saluces, Bordeaux, sauternes, 1997: From split. You know, I love sauternes. Less for the wonderful aromatics, like the candied orange rind, white flowers, nutmeg and lichee that this wine shows, than for the oily, viscous, coating, unctuous mouth feel. It just slithers, coats, envelops you…to quote Old School, “Once it hits your lips it’s so good!” This 1997 does not really show the pumped up aromatics of truly great Yquem…but the palate…ohhhhh my! Very nice indeed, with wonderful depth and great length. I don’t think it will ever achieve the other worldliness of the 1976, nor does it have the stuffing of the 2001…but it will do! Drink or Hold.

***Jocelyn Lonen, Sangiacomo vineyard, Sonoma County, chardonnay, 2006: Super. I love Sangiacomo fruit – both chard and merlot. Bright, spicy, lemony, verbena. A bit racy on the palate…good minerals, nice oak integration. Reminds me a lot of the Shafer Red Shoulders Ranch bottling. Long, spicy finish. All in all very nice.

A few abbreviated updates: The ****Eric Texier Cote Rotie VV, 2001 is still simply mind blowing. An amazing, seemingly unending assembly of flavors, all perfectly integrated and balanced. This wine can be had for under $50 a bottle - which to me would seem to be almost criminal and certainly a screaming buy. The ****Aubert, Ritchie vineyard, Sonoma Coast, chardonnay, 2004 is quickly becoming my favorite chardonnay in the world. So consistent, so perfumed, so deep…just a wonderful example of great chardonnay. ***Failla, Keefer vineyard, Russian River Valley, chardonnay, 2005 is also delicious, in a much more understated, malic, slightly more brisk kind of way. More of the Mersault style than the Corton like Aubert. Lovely. The ****Pol Roger, Sir Winston Churchill cuvee, Eperney, champagne, 1990 is a classic. Outstanding example of bottle aged, vintage champagne. Still vibrant and frisky, it shows great citrus and lavender, with yeasty baked apple notes. lemon curd and cardamom. Endless depth, wonderful palate feel, long finish. Superlative – and very much ready to drink now.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Wine Musings: Vol#53 The Thomas Brown Affair

The following wines were all tasted over the course of an evening while dining at the Tribeca Grill. As Monday nights offer a very reasonable, no corkage BYO policy, the restaurant offers the perfect venue for an evening with wine and friends in New York City at a relative bargain. And the service, regardless of BYO, is impeccable. Many thanks to a staff that decanted all 10 wines, served and removed stemware with attention and timeliness and was always extremely polite. I am a frequent diner – and yet wish I dined there more often.

It should be noted that most, nearly all, of the wines were provided by Thomas Rivers Brown, the noted Napa / Sonoma (by way of South Carolina) wine maker. In fact, Thomas is the wine maker for all of these noted wines, thus creating a theme for the evening. Many of the wines have yet even to be released to the public or have published tasting notes available of which I am aware – some even enjoying an inaugural release in the 2005 vintage - making it a real pleasure and special occasion to try them. To the wines (in order of tasting, not by merit):

**++Nicholson Ranch, Cuvee Natalie Reserve, Sonoma Valley, chardonnay, 2005: I am afraid the start was less than auspicious. Clearly made in a very popular style, the cuvee Natalie is a flamboyant, unctuous white wine, fat with lemony, tropical fruit, vanilla and thickly oaked. It unfortunately, to my palate, lacks the depth, complexity and concentration to really pull off this kind of signature (I think Pahlmeyer succeeds here very nicely). It was best described by one taster as “A coconut cream pie served on a slab of oak”. I perhaps would have made it a lemon meringue, coconut cream pie, but otherwise tend to agree. Again, perhaps exaggerated but not a bad wine. Moving on.

****Rivers-Marie, Summa Vineyard, Sonoma Coast, pinot noir 2006: This wine, by contrast, was my favorite of the evening, though it was not the consensus blue ribbon (in fact I am not sure if it was necessarily even the "best" wine of the evening; just the one I enjoyed drinking the most). Wonderful, fragrant, fresh, perhaps a bit delicate, this wine exudes a deep, feminine rose petal, lavender, orange tisane quality that just lures me in. Clearly very young, I think it will add weight with further bottle time, but it is so hard to stay away from now. The palate is lively but still extremely fine and deep, adding cola, licorice root and pink peppercorn notes from attack all the way through to the lingering, finely grained finish, where the fruit darkens just slightly and adds a forest floor element. Really a great drink.

****GTS, Seaver Family Vineyard, Diamond Mountain, cabernet sauvignon 2005 (release June 2008): Wonderful. The first ever release for this wine (in fact it is not really even yet released), it bodes extremely well for the label. Amy’s favorite wine of the evening. All finesse and balance, this wine wins you over with subtlety and grace. Mostly red fruit driven, it is fairly open knit and nuanced, adding wonderful lavender, plum, forest floor and chocolate. Some noted an alluring black powder, graphite element (I admit to not having ever smelled black powder – this one taster was an ex-marine!) that added to the complexity of the wine. Well oaked, the vanilla is complementary and perfectly integrated, doing what oak is supposed to do, buoying the fruit’s natural elements, not overmatching them. The palate too is extremely inviting, balanced and integrated with more dark fruit, cigar leaf and espresso bean. Finish is long, spicy and sweet. I really enjoyed this wine very much and look forward to drinking more of it as it adds some bottle age.

***+Two Hands, Charlie’s Patch, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 2005: Wow! Hold on to your hats. If you were expecting the smooth, silky, round fruity “Bella’s Garden” shiraz experience you had better regroup! This is a monster of a wine. Massive, deep, laser focused notes of blue and black fruits, menthol, pine and chalk prick up the ears and make you take immediate notice. The palate is a bottomless well lined with granite, deep, deep deep with excellent minerlaity and structure that will make you wince. The finish is almost searing and of ridiculous length, though I have to say this wine has believe it or not softened since I tasted it in barrel. A true vin de garde in the old school, Randy Dunn of the early 80s sense. Given how packed, how stuffed this wine is, I am sure it will reward patience in the cellar. Only caveat is that if this wine lacks anything, it may be balance…perhaps it will sort itself out with time. Again, an inaugural effort.

****Outpost Winery, True Vineyard, Howell Mountain, cabernet sauvignon, 2005 (release May 2008): Many selected this wine as their wine of the evening. It was a complete unknown to us and we had no expectations when opening it (though I am a huge fan of the Outpost Howell Mountain zinfandels). As it turns out, in many ways it was the belle of the ball, stately, manicured, “complete” as one taster suggested, this wine posseses stature and depth that makes you pause and admire. Wonderful concentration and balance, it is very Bordelaise in its purposefulness and composition (and in its varietal assembly as it turns out - though mostly cab). Still, its purity and focus VERY much belie its Napa Valley roots. Deep, dark, blue black fruits, perfumed violet, subtle tones of briar, amazing minerlaity – like liquid slate, all perfectly integrated, this wine is pure elegance. Wonderful, coating palate deftly balanced from entry to long, steely yet fine, tannic finish. Velvet glove / iron fist? Yup. To think this is the inaugural vintage. What kind of wine can this vineyard make when it has settled in? Word to the wise…get in line now! I have no idea of the price point and honestly care very little: this wine is a buy.

***Maybach Family Vineyards, Materium, Oakville, cabernet sauvignon, 2005 (release May 2008): Finally, a known commodity! The 2004 Maybach was one of my wines of the Polaner Puck building tasting awhile back – and I was quick to secure a few bottles, even at $110 a pop. I will say that the 2005 does not disappoint, though it does not approach the 2004 effort. Like the Seaver, this wine is open and inviting. Perhaps lacking the structure and depth of the Seaver, this may lay a bit flatter, though it does offer yummy flavor and aroma nuances of licorice root, red fruit, smoke, lavender and spice box. The palate is of medium weight and perfectly balanced adding peppery chocolate and a wonderful creamy palate feel ending in fine, sweet tannins. I will drink this wine with great pleasure while await the supposed-to-be mind blowing 2006.

***Diamond Terrace, Howell Mountain, cabernet sauvignon, 2005 (release June 2008): Interesting that Thomas would select a wine made by a winery on Diamond Mountain, with estate grapes from Diamond Mountain, that was made from Howell mountain fruit. Only 95 cases of this were made. I think it was perhaps my least favorite of the TRB wines, though certainly worthy. It is made in a very heralded, extracted style, that has done very well for wines like Husic and Plump Jack. Raisin-y, stewed plum, chocolaty, almond and baker’s spices waft from the glass. The palate offers more overripe fruit and briar. I cannot but help think of a chocolate, prune Danish (or even better hamantaschen – it is close to Purim!) Amy quips, “This wine is so chocolaty it should come wrapped in foil!” – It is very much a dessert by itself. I am sure Parker will love this Turley-like cab…so if scores matter to you – go out and grab it! While better than any Husic or Plump Jack made, it is still not really my style of cabernet.

****Schrader, ToKalon Beckstoffer vineyard, Oakville, cabernet sauvignon, 2005: Ahhh yes – the Fred Schrader wines. Well, here we are. These wines blew my mind in barrel…and they are better in bottle. Thomas is on a mission with these wines. He has set out to prove just how good the ToKalon Vineyard product is and, even with the vineyards accolades firmly in place, how it can be consistently transformed into something other worldly given the right touch. These wines remind me of the New England Patriots…they show up and simply play their game, regardless of conditions. Good vintage? Tough vintage? Hardly matters – these wines always excel. I guess this is supposed to be the base wine, though there is nothing base about it. A great assembly of soy, red and black currant fruit, cassis, sassy rubbing spices, floral lavender and herbs, this wine has endless, layered depth, amazing purity and wonderful concentration. The palate is voluminous, the wine itself voluptuous and toned at the same time. All kept in perfect balance. Fantastic.

****+Schrader, T-6, ToKalon Beckstoffer vineyard, Oakville, cabernet sauvignon, 2005: The T-6 really echoes all of the “Schrader” Schrader notes, with an even stronger emphasis on the candied violet element within the profile. Perhaps more singularly focused on purity and concentration, this wine is like an Olympic gymnast doing a perfect floor routine – focused, intense, no loose footwork, nothing out of place. Amazing minerality, “a touch of white pepper” was a common comment made. Outstanding.

****Schrader, CCS, ToKalon Beckstoffer vineyard, Oakville, cabernet sauvignon, 2005: For many, this was the wine of the tasting. All of the above notes, with perhaps a rounder, more flamboyant essence to it. I detected an added note of Vienna roasted coffee bean, which added yet more nuance and sophistication to the nose and palate. Still, do not be misled – this wine is about the fruit. Just jam packed, waves and waves of it. Wow. Really a wine you almost surrender all of your sense to. Dynamite in all the ways a wine can be dynamite!

In the end, I think the stated preferences for specific wines said more about the tasters than the wines themselves. All were well made, without exception. If you were more of a purist and appreciated stature, the Outpost must have been very highly rated. A hedonist? The Schrader wines were hard to beat. Looking for a wine you can spoon with after your love affair? The GTS was gentle, deep and warm. All in all…a wonderful tour de force. Thanks Thomas!

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Wine Musings: Vol#52


Wine of Merit: ****+Chateau Angelus, Estate, St. Emillion, Bordeaux, 1990: A very special wine. Initially requiring patience, this wine unfolds in layers. Two hours later, velvety aromas of plum, cigar tobacco, grilled meats, sage, lavender and mocha. Palate shows more mature red and black fruits, cardamom, baker’s spices and minerals. Coating. Long, thick, spicy finish. Almost timeless. This and Cheval Blanc are the wines I think of when I drink St. Emillion wines. Superb.

****Chateau Pichon Longueville, Comtesse de Lalande, Estate, Paulliac, Bordeaux, 1990: Quintessential Paulliac. This wine is controversial as it received lower scores at release. Here to, a wine that requires patience at initial pour. 3 hours later and it is still evolving and needs more time. Black and blue fruits, lead pencil (cedar+graphite), forest floor, candied violet, rosemary and chalk. Deep palate, ripe purple fruit with excellent minerality. With time the fruit becomes pronounced on the nose and palate, at once succulent and vibrant. Long, firmly tannic finish. Very much a buy these days (similar to the 83 Mouton awhile back) as it is overshadowed by other vintages and higher scores – but is very worthy (as was found out in the 83 Mouton – try buying it today).

****Kongsgaard, VioRuss, Napa Valley, viognier / roussanne, 2005: Superlative. I decided to open this bottle after tasting the Whetstone viognier. My recollection had been that this wine was significantly better than the Whetstone - could it be? Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Clause. A completely different wine experience. Expansive, lush but not flabby or vague, this is a wine that I could bathe in happily. Soaring notes of apricot, tangerine, almond and vanilla accompany enveloping scents of Hibiscus and Lilac. More orange zest, marzipan and nutmeg on the deep palate, excellent minerality, long powdered sugar and mulling spice finish. Are you serious? Fantastic!

***++Veuve Cliquot Ponsardin, La Grande Dame, Reims, Champagne, 1990: Superb. Granny Smith apple pie. A wonderful accompanying note of lime and orange blossom. Lemon chiffon on the palate. Great acidity. Aged but not old – this wine has plenty of stuffing. A wonderful way to start a meal.

***++Spottswoode, Estate, St. Helena, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 1996: Delicious. Candied nose of blueberries, raspberries, milk chocolate, white flowers. Ripe red fruited palate, good minerals, hazelnut and coffee. Nice, spicy finish. A great wine to have with a chocolate desert! Yummy.

***Chateau Clarke, Listrac Medoc, Bodeaux, 2003: A Wonderful value. Baron Edmund Rothschild’s investment has really paid off. This is a dynamite wine at a great price (under $30). Classic, dense, chewy Bordeaux. Nose of cassis, plum, leather, forest bottom licorice and smoke. Firm, coating palate offers more black fruit, minerals, espresso and chocolate. Long, fine, firm finish. Will continue to evolve with cellaring though it offers plenty of pleasure right now. Hard to beat!

**++Bjornstad, Van der Kamp Vineyard, Sonoma Coast, pinot noir, 2005: Better. Having been generally disappointed with the Bjornstad wines, this is at least better than average. Possessing the vineyard specific length and grip that Van der Kamp is known for, this wine has good depth and minerality, suggesting it will benefit from some laying down. The nose is also deep, black cherry, cinnamon, forest floor and tea notes. Some spice box. Already throwing a ton of sediment, this feels like a pretty “sauvage” wine that will take on complexity as it ages. Long finish. Good effort.

Saturday, March 1, 2008

Wine Musings Vol#51: Whetstone Wine Dinner


Dinner with Jamey Whetstone:

I had the pleasure of attending a wine dinner that featured Jamey Whetstone’s wines with Jamey himself in attendance. While casual and very warm - his South Carolinian charm in full regalia - it is clear that Jamey 1) is earnest in his endeavor to make great wine and 2) has the chops to pull it off. Having recently tried his latest pinot and having enjoyed the Jocelyn Lonen wines, I was excited to try a broader portfolio. The wines are reviewed not in order of merit but order of consumption during the meal:

**+Manifesto!, California, sauvignon blanc, 2006: Sourced from Suisun fruit, around 10 tons an acre stainless steel fermented. A lot of copy about “Great wine” on the label. I know great wine – and while this is not bad…no one will mistake it for great. Fairly typical, in my opinion. Grapefruit, guava, nice, bracing acidity, good full mouth feel. With so many good, inexpensive SBs out there, I find this nice but not compelling. Wanna try a great SB? Sample a few of Didier Dagueneau’s wines from the Loire. And before someone cries unfair…remember I wasn’t the one to print “Great” on the label.

**+Whetstone, Catie’s Corner Vineyard, Sonoma, viognier, 2006: Here again, not bad at all – though not compelling. I like Catie’s Corner viognier; many Sonoma vintners use it to pump up the flavors and aromatics of their syrah. By itself it displays typical varietal characteristics of hibiscus, vanilla, lavender and slate. Nice minerlaity on the palate and bracing acids. There are few new world viogniers that really matter to me – the Failla viognier from the Alban vineyard and the Kongsgaard roussanne / viognier being two that come to mind. This wine does not break through to that level of quality or wine experience.

After a glass of the ***+Whetstone Pleasant Hill, RRV pinot noir, 2006 (previously reviewed) I had a glass of the ***++Whetstone Bella Vigne Vineyard, Sonoma Coast, pinot noir, 2006. This is a lovely, lush, velvety pinot noir, and a great partner to the Pleasant Hill. Where the Pleasant Hill is bright and exuberant, the Bella Vigne exhibits dark, deep, creamy black cherry, thyme, forest floor, church incense and Malabar pepper notes. Reminiscent of the older Williams Selyem Sonoma Coast pinots from the early 90s that I covet. The palate is equally lush and coating, deep, more minerals and red / black fruit. Baking spices. The only small distraction on this wine is a slight bitterness on the long, peppery finish. At $75 a pop – perhaps a bit steep. I have to say, I feel that he has made huge strides since that 2004 Hirsch pinot that I had last year that I found hot and disjointed. Well done Jamey!

A pleasant surprise was the ***Whetstone, Giudici Family Vineyard, Sonoma Coast, syrah, 2005. Meaty, red and black fruit, pain grille, rosemary and Provencal herbs, smoke…a real treat. Perfumed and sexy, still this is much more reminiscent of a Cote Rotie than a Santa Barbara fruit bomb. Seamlessly integrated and balanced. Long, sweet, fine finish. Dynamite! Similar in style and signature to the Phoenix Ranch syrah that Failla makes (and now, at dinner, I find out he was making the wine for Ehren Jordan at Failla up til 2005! I find it strange Ehren wouldn’t make the wine himself), but better.

The last 2 cabernets are not made under the Whetstone label. The first is a **++Temple Family Vineyard, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 2004: Nice enough. From the Coombsville area. Dusty red fruit, cassis, cedar, some cigar tobacco. I found it a bit muted. Nice full palate, more red fruit, balanced throughout, medium, spicy finish. A very nice wine that can be enjoyed in the near to mid term. I admit that my first glass seemed a bit off and thus I may require a re-taste at some point.

The other (and last!) wine was the ***+Jocelyn Lonen, Founder’s Reserve, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 2004: This is a selection of the 4 best barrels of cabernet that Jocelyn makes for the vintage, from the Stagecoach vineyard. Stagecoach cabernet franc, about 14%, is added to the final blend. I am a huge Stagecoach cab franc fan and feel that this adds interesting complexity and texture to this wine. I enjoyed this wine very much, though many would find it heavy handed and perhaps a bit over manufactured with its prevalent New French Oak signature and obvious blending. Still…Deep and floral, velvety red fruit, chocolate licorice, anise, candied violet and cinnamon notes waft from the glass. Wonderful, thick cherry pie, creamy vanilla ice cream and chocolate on the palate – I can’t help but think of a cherry chocolate swirl, served with a red velvet cupcake…yummy. It’s like a Willy Wonka wine…I can’t believe these taste sensations are coming from a glass of fermented grape juice! A great accompaniment to my chocolate desert. Fun and delicious, no excuses necessary…just enjoy!

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Wine Musings @ 50: The Half Century


Wine of Merit: ****+Chateau Lafite Rothschild, Estate Vineyard, Paulliac, cabernet sauvignon, 1999: A stately, formidable wine. Archetypal Paulliac nose of blue fruits, cassis, graphite, chalk, licorice root. Amazing depth. Strong, gripping palate, the emphasis on balance and integration makes it surprisingly full and rich at the same time. Harmonious. Lithe yet sure footed. Perfectly toned, almost sculpted. A serious wine that almost lulls you to sleep with its grace – but upon deeper inspection approaches mythological stature (the painted reference to the eclipse above the label and the sprightly engraved “1999” on the bottle only adding to the effect). At over $400, no longer a screaming buy…but certainly worthy.

****Chateau Mouton Rothschild, Estate Vineyard, Paulliac, cabernet sauvignon, 1999: Pure Sex. You know the sex Dudley Moore fantasized about with Bo Derek on the beach in “10”? That kind of sex. Wonderful, thick roiling layers of red fruit, currants, cigar smoke, cedar, morels, Provencal herbs, lavender waft up from the glass. Velvety, coating, voluptuous palate of black and blue fruits, mint chocolate, wood spices. Dried cherries and black pepper on the long, sweet finish. Youthful, well balanced, enthusiastic…nubile? Not that this wine would ever be confused with an 82, 86 or 00 Mouton, but it does possess a wonderful come hither quality that cannot be ignored. And at a price point south of $200 – a great buy and drinking great right now.

****Newton, Unfiltered, Napa Valley, chardonnay, 2003: Wonderful. I much prefer this vintage to the 2002, which garnered much more press due primarily to its flamboyant style. This wine has better balance and integration. I have reviewed this wine before and the earlier notes stay true – fresh, perfumed verbena, citrus, lemon custard, fine minerality, orange blossom. Kissed with oak, long in the finish…dynamite wine. Hard to believe you can get this at $30. Great buy.

***Cavallotto, Bricco Boschis, Langhe, Friesa, 2005: My luck with lower priced wines continues! Here is another sub $20 red very worthy of consideration. Cavalotto is well known for making good, honest, Piemontese wines from Faletto, of exceptional note their Barolo from their estate on the Bricco Boschis site. This Friesa – a lighter bodied grape known for higher acids - lacks the seriousness of the Barolo perhaps, but it makes up for it in youthful exuberance and approachability. Bright red fruit, violets, great minerals and pepper. On the palate – more red fruit and pepper…the racy acids make this a great food wine and I bet would go great with tomato based sauces, almost like a full bodied pinot noir. The finish is soft with baking spices. Yummy!

***Slaughterhouse Cellars, Proprietors Reserve, Rutherford, cabernet sauvignon, 2002: Lovely. We can argue later whether naming a wine slaughterhouse is a good idea…the wine is worthy of compliment. Very red fruit / plum driven and rose petal perfumed, almost feminine, this reminds me of a Dr. Crane vineyard cabernet. The fruit notes integrate in a velvety mĂ©lange with soy, cedar, pipe tobacco and melted licorice. Cab Franc adds some richness and depth, along with morel and espresso macchiato. The palate is open knit and welcoming, coating front to back. Not super long but fine and silky. Really very nice indeed.

***John Tyler, Baciagalupi Vineyard, Russain River Valley, pinot noir, 2002: Who doesn’t like to say “Baciagalupi”? It is simply fun to say! And this wine is fun to drink. Simply delicious. Great expression of RRV terroir, this creamy, black cherry, cola driven pinot is plain old yummy. Great integration of Provencal herbs, Malabar pepper on the palate and a fine, silky sweet finish. I have had this wine previously on release and I think it has gotten even better. This time I am impressed with its depth and texture, great mouthfeel and balance. Another pound the table buy at around $30. No excuses needed to enjoy this wine while thinking to yourself, “Baciagalupi! Hee hee”.

**++David Coffaro Vineyard and Winery, Estate Vineyard, Dry Creek Valley, carignane, 1996: How can you not love David Coffaro? His joyous, centered attitude just infiltrates every aspect of his wine. You can taste the pleasure winemaking brings him right in the glass. I would soundly recommend that anybody who is not familiar with David check him and his wine out…especially his futures program which offers yummy wine at ridiculously low prices ($10 a pop when I bought this, now maybe $20). As it turns out, his wines are really wonderful – I love his estate cuvee. This wine probably could have been drunk awhile back but still offers lots of pleasure right now. Camphor, dry creek spicy red fruit, briar, black pepper…racy acids add a zing that makes this a great food wine. Finish is still spicy and long. Great example of Dry Creek terroir. No surprise Doug Nalle sources from here. Thanks David.

**++Bjornstad Cellars, Ritchie Vineyard, Russian River Valley, chardonnay, 2005: Very good, if paling significantly against the Aubert and Ramey iterations of the same. I think that may actually be a perfect tasting note; it is just like those wines but much less so. Less perfumed, less meyer lemon, less corton-like linseed, marzipan and custard. A touch more malic, wood slightly more evident on the palate, less oily and unctuous…very nicely balanced…just not what I have come to expect from this RRV gran cru vineyard. And at $50 there is little value here.