Wine Musings Vol#93

Wine of Merit: ****Araujo, Eisele vineyard, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 2004: I am often puzzled by why Araujo does not garner as much praise as many of the other “cult” cabernets from Napa. Maybe it’s the clear choice of elegance and refinement over raw extraction? In any case, it is clearly deserving of high praise. This 2004 is testament. Alluring, sophisticated notes of plum pudding, cured tobacco, cedar and dried fig. Excellent concentration and perfect balance from nose through to back of palate. On the palate minerals, chocolate and mint are added to the plum notes and glide front to back. Fine, resolving finish. Delicious. A great wine experience.

***++Ceritas, Porter Bass vineyard, Russian River Valley, chardonnay, 2007: This is the third vintage made under this label by the owners of the Porter Bass vineyard. A wonderful wine. Medium weight and at first shy, this wine opened up with a bit of aeration to reveal lemon zest and kafir lime notes, accompanied by orange blossom, grapefruit, wet slate and a mélange of exotic spices. Sturdy structure with excellent acidity and length. While taught, this wine offers a lot of pleasure right now, as well as the promise of more developed notes with time in the cellar. Great effort. Only 88 cases made.

***++Rivers Marie, Thieriot vineyard, Sonoma Coast, chardonnay, 2007: An inaugural effort, this chardonnay was far and away the table’s favorite of the night. Right in between the Ceritas and the Aubert efforts, the RM chardonnay hits many of the former wine’s bright fruit notes with a slightly broader, richer palate that includes marzipan and a touch of hazelnut. Palate is generous but focused with a lingering mineral and citrus pith finish. A lovely wine and an amazing value at $45.

***++Aubert, Lauren vineyard, Sonoma Coast, chardonnay, 2004: If it is possible, this wine has become even more unctuous over time. Thick, oily, lemony, cardamom laced buttered popcorn, crème brulee and almond. Full, coating mouth feel, candied citrus and minerals. Delicious for it’s over the top, hedonistic nature. Drink soon.

***++Lokoya, Howell Mountain, cabernet sauvignon, 2003: Served from magnum. I would characterize this wine as very similar in profile to the O’Shaughnessy cabernet listed below, but with more depth and focus. I am not sure if this is attributable to the vintage differences, format differences or otherwise. But this Lokoya adds chalk, a stronger mineral profile and licorice root to the fruited elements. The blue/black fruit is also more focused and youthful. A powerful wine for sure, but with excellent overall symmetry. Another reason to be a Howell Mountain cabernet fan.

***+O’Shaughnessy Vineyards, Howell Mountain, cabernet sauvignon, 2002: This cab splits the difference between the Merus (below mentioned) and the Araujo. Clearly mountain grown, this wine offers beautifully balanced brambly, deep, dark blue/black fruited cabernet aromas, adding tar, lead pencil and smoke. Not vague in any way, but much more extracted than the Araujo, it also adds a touch of green sweetness I associate with spearmint. Firm-ish palate, excellent oak integration, long finish. A very worthy effort made by folks who clearly take pride in the Howell Mountain terroir.

***+Merus, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 2004: Where the Araujo focuses on balance and integration, Merus substitutes depth and concentration. Almost aussie like in its primary fruit focus. Black and blue berry fruit preserves, cocoa powder, licorice root. A deep, thick iteration of cabernet. A bit ponderous, but still fun and very much delicious in a “…and for desert I’ll take the 5 lb. banana split sundae challenge! (gasps heard around the table)” kind of way. If you believe more is more, then Merus is for you. Even the bottle is oversized for a typical 750ml. Big!

***+ Chateau Langoa Barton, St. Julien, Bordeaux, 2000: A sister wine of the famed Ch. Leoville Barton. This wine has verve. Refreshingly NOT from Napa, one is immediately confronted with exuberant black fruit laced with animal, nicoise olive and bay leaf notes. The palate continues the assault, including a saline element, baker’s chocolate and racy red and black currants. Full, powerful, long tannic finish. Great with food. A yummy wine from a dynamite vintage. Drink or hold.

Wine Musings LTD: From Angwin to Zahtila

Following are my notes from my recent Napa trip in April. Over all, I note a few trends, some heartening while others disturbing.

1) The general quality of Napa Valley wines continues to improve. Really dynamite stuff.
2) The trend to overripe, high alcohol wines is creating heady, flabby wines that will not age nearly as well. Balance seems to have been lost in translation.
3) There is a belief among many wine makers that your wine MUST cost above $100 a bottle to be considered worth buying. Wow. What happened?
4) With some exception, there is a greater than ever push for folks who are visiting to buy wine directly. These winery visits are becoming more like Tupperware parties. This is not about educating qualified prospects about the brand with longer term brand loyalty the key metric…this is about sales right now regardless of retail wine avails. Yuck.

On to the wines.

Our first stop was Zahtila Vineyards, in Calistoga at the top of the Silverado Trail. The wines are of merit, particularly the cab they make from the Beckstoffer vineyard.

**+Zahtila Vineyards Chardonnay, 2006: Newly bottled. Very Napa valley. Bright, tropical fruits, candied citrus zest, good acids, integrated, mineral finish. A nice palate refresher.

***Zahtila Vineyards Dry Creek Zinfandel, 2004: From the Oddone vineyard. Lovely Dry Creek fruit cloaked in lavish American new oak. The oak is most noticeable on the front of the palate, where it creates a caffe latte like entry. Then the red, spiced Dry Creek fruit takes over. Nice mouth feel and integration. I am not in zin buying mode but bought 3 bottles. Nice.

**+Zahtila Vineyards Oat Hill Estate Zinfandel, 2004: From estate vines. A more Napa, black fruit, brambly style of zin. Over 15% alch. Nice, though not the kind of wine I tend to like.

***+Zahtila Vineyards Beckstoffer Vineyards Georges III, 2003: A Lovely wine. Excellent concentration and depth. Black berry and stone fruit, Rutherford dust, good minerlaity. The oak integrates nicely without ever dominating. Long, sweet finish. I like this wine. At $48, compared to other cabs tried, it is a steal.

Our next stop is Failla, also along the Silverado Trail. The tasting “house” is far out and I would recommend a visit. It is fun and different. Of course the wines are great – in fact, I would say that on the whole the wines poured were amongst the best of the trip.

***++Failla Keefer Ranch Chardonnay, 2004: A significant improvement from the 2003 vintage for this wine in my opinion. Wonderful notes lemon chiffon, Anjou pear and white flowers. Full, lush mouthfeel. Acids are balanced and not quite as brisk as the 2003. Slate. Long finish. Like a really good Chasagne Montrachet 1er cru.

***++Failla Sonoma Coast Pinot Noir, 2005: I really liked this wine quire a bit. Deep, lush pinot notes of black cherry, green tea, cola and baking spices. Not fat, but full. Creamy mouthfeel. Long, peppery finish. Yum.

***++Failla Keefer Ranch Pinot Noir, 2005: Another winner. Not quite as flamboyant as the Sonoma Coast. More focused and intense. Much more structured, this wine offers great complexity already and will reward time in the cellar. Big with great bones.

***Failla Phoenix Ranch Syrah, 2004: Very nice, if a bit of a recipe wine. 50% whole cluster, 50% berry, this wine is aged in 1/3 new oak. Delicious if a bit expected. Very varietal fruit with the whole cluster providing grilled meats and clove to the mix. Full and pleasant. I think I have been drinking too much syrah!

The last stop on day 1 was Cardinale, where we sampled both the Cardinale and the Lokoya wines in a lovely setting, courtesy of the always generous Brian Baker. I will say that the Lokoya wines were indeed very special and very much worth seeking out – note that the winery “MSRP” is a heady $190 a bottle but the wines can be had for as little (!) as $130 retail. The Cardinale wines were also lovely, a blend of the above vineyards, stags leap fruit and merlot, but at the same asking price seem to be a questionable QPR (quality to price ratio) buy.

***++Lokoya Diamond Mountain, 2003: Super. Lovely balance, nuanced nose of bakers chocolate, black fruit and chalk. Wonderfully integrated, smooth mouthfeel, offering casis, black fruit, chocolate and a touch of sois bois. Stately.

****Lokoya Howell Mountain, 2003: Really very lovely. More pronounced aromatics of cigar box, red and black brambly fruit, a touch of tar. Lush mouthfeel with excellent concentration, adding mocha elements. Firm finish with sweet, coating tannins. Elegant. Amy’s favorite.

****+Lokoya Mt. Veeder, 2003: Wow. Great intensity and structure. Blue black fruits, chalk, minerals, pepper, violets. Great depth on the palate and perfect balance. Makes me think of Paulliac. Will reward aging. The purebred of the group. Powerful.

***+Cardinale, 2003: A very good effort. The wine offers mature, perfectly ripe, focused red fruit, chocolate, tobacco, black pepper and smoke. Full, lush coating palate with a pleasing licorice element and a note of minerals. Long, furry, juicy finish. Delicious.

****Cardinale, 2004: Stellar. All of the same characteristics as the 2003, this wine offers even more focus and concentration. The finish is very firm making this a candidate for the cellar.