Friday, December 28, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#43


Wine of Merit: ****Staglin Family vineyard, Estate cabernet sauvignon, Rutherford, 1997: Wow. A stately, maybe statuesque wine. I guess it is not bragging if you can do it, and I find the Staglin wines to be the authoritative benchmark for Rutherford cab vintage in and vintage out. This cab possesses just leagues of depth – very much like a powerful Paulliac in a great vintage. Cassis, black and blue fruit, graphite, cedar, tisane…a wonderful combination. Perfect integration across the palate – new oak adds a mocha nuance with more minerals and blueberry and Malabar pepper. Super long, juicy, concentrated finish. A serious wine that is bringing it’s “A” game.

***++Phelps, Insignia, Napa Valley, 1997: Quintessential Insignia. Fresh mint, dark chocolate, wonderful flavor integration. Palate is still full and round, open knit and welcoming. Finish is also full but sweet and fine. Insignia is famous for its timelessness and this is another example of a wine that seems like it could age another 10 years without any effort.

***+Plumpjack, reserve, Napa valley, cabernet sauvignon, 1997: This wine has settled down and actually added some nuance that makes me appreciate it more. Still thick and unctuous, it has a touch of green olive and cigar tobacco that makes it interesting. The palate is chewy, with licorice root and briar added to the chocolate covered raisin base note. The finish is firm and youthful. Another example of a wine still awaiting its prime, some ten years later. Nice!

***+Tom Eddy, Napa Valley, cabernet sauvignon, 1997: A wine that I have always appreciated and always wondered why it hasn’t taken off. Very Napa, this wine shows yummy cassis, chalky minerals and chocolate, along with bright red fruit. Great depth and breadth on the palate all the way to the furry, fine, peppery tannic finish. Very well crafted and delicious.

***+Chalk Hill, Estate, Sonoma County, chardonnay, 1997: Staying with the theme - this was quite a surprise. Great pale straw color. Youthful but complex and delicious. I would have guessed Corton if served blind. Wonderful lemon custard, linseed, slate and popcorn – not flabby but full bodied and still holding its shape perfectly. Palate is full but still nice, zingy acids and a lovely firm, citrus-y finish. In no hurry at all. Great example of a chard that can be cellared with confidence. Yum.

***+Enrico Santini, Poggio al Moro, Bolgheri, 2005: To celebrate our planning a summer trip to the Maremma, I have decided to dig in to wines from that region from now until then. This is an excellent start. This is a fairly new estate, practicing sustainable, organic viticulture. Yummy, unassuming, $25-30 (in Italy it sells for $14!)…sounds like a winner! 30% Sangiovese, the remainder mostly Bordeaux varietals – with 10% syrah thrown in for good measure. Out of the gate, the impression is mostly the Sangiovese, with spicy red currant and cherry fruit, leather and lavender. The mouth feel is generous and integrates well with the flavors, which now include chocolate, plum and vanilla. The finish is sweet, not terribly firm, and delicious. With time the wine takes characteristics of the other varietals, the red fruit gives into the plum, chocolate, licorice and mint, though somehow it always retains its Tuscan sense of place. Great. Santini’s other wine, Montepergoli, is also worth seeking out – at a higher price point.

***Flora Springs Trilogy, Napa Valley, 1987: Stately, if a bit over the hill. I have always been a fan of this balanced, nuanced wine made by the steady hand of Ken Deis for these last 27 years. I believe at this point it was still made with equal parts cab, cab franc and merlot – hence the name. Since then it has added the other Bordeaux varietals of Malbec and Petite Verdot. In its old age now, it still shows heady aromas of tobacco, morel mushroom, raspberry jam and violets. Touch of soy and black licorice. Thinning now on the palate it does not however drop off at any point – seamless to the furry finish. Very much worth drinking - but I am glad this was a cellar orphan. Owned and stored since release.

**++Zahtila Vineyards, Oddone vineyard, Dry Creek zinfandel, 2004: Very nice. Reminiscent of the Rafanelli – just less so. Perhaps to make up for it, the oak (American) is much more center stage, adding café latte and vanilla elements to the raspberry fruit, spice box and Malabar pepper notes. Given the good QPR of Rafanelli – this wine would have to sit the bench.

Saturday, December 15, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#42

Wine of NO MERIT: ??? Chateau Mouton Rothschild, Paulliac, Bordeaux, 1978: This wine was a DQ - at an important celebration - as it was heavily maderized. The cork was in shambles. I publish this only to remind myself and others that buying older vintage wine on the secondary market is very much akin to buying a watch on Canal Street in NYC. Good luck. I bought this watch...er wine...from what I would have thought to be a reputable source. It was crap and had clearly been stored very badly. I promise myself that from now on - unless it is from an estate re-release or from someone like the Rare Wine Company in Sonoma, I am not buying these email list "rare gems" anymore. Harummph!

***+A. Rafanelli, Dry Creek Valley, zinfandel, 2005: Mmmm. I love Raffanelli zins. This wine is big, bright, brassy red raspberry, spice box, cigar tobacco. Yum! The palate is a bit racy but delivers zingy red fruit and white pepper. Firm but integrated finish. Really delicious and a big crowd pleaser. Great example of a Dry Creek zin – which in my opinion are the best ones on earth!

***+Franciscan, Magnificat, Napa Valley, 2004: A bruiser. This is Franciscan’s Bordeaux-like meritage, assembling cabernet, merlot and a dollop of cab franc for a dynamite wine. Deep, brooding, black fruit, tobacco, cassis and sage. Seamless. Big wine with lots of stuffing, it requires a piece or grilled red meat or perhaps some cellaring time to really show its stuff. Firm palate leads to a big, but well integrated and fine finish. A very nice wine at a very decent price point (I think it can be had for around $45). Excellent QPR.

***+Chateau Lafite Rothschild, Paulliac Bordeaux, 1988: Pulled from the cellar for a special occasion. The wine has matured a great deal in the last 5 years. Still sophisticated and black fruit driven, it has thinned just a bit. Typical graphite, cedar, cassis, forest floor and minerals with some coaxing, just not with the endless depth that I associate with this wine. The palate is full and coating as it opens up over the course of our meal – offering more black fruit, minerals and chocolate - in fact the entire wine experience benefits from air. The finish is firm and pleasing. Really, this wine is a winner, it was just so mind boggling last I had it I cannot help but be just a tad disappointed.

***+Galleron, Napa Valley cabernet, 2000: A mixture of Taplin and Morisoli fruit. I love the Morisoli vineyard. This wine does not disappoint – in fact it is magically delicious! Really great right now, the wine throws off serious, spicy red and black berry fruit, clove, cedar and cassis. Mint chocolate. The palate is nicely integrated and offers great balance all the way to the sweet, polished ending. Really dynamite wine.

***Ridge, Geyersville, zinfandel, 2000: I am a huge Geyserville fan. I love the field blend nature of it…and how it ages and grows in complexity. In 2000, the wine was 66% zinfandel, with a large (17%) petite sirah. Given the long growing season, this wine enjoyed great maturity of fruit – and it shows. Rich, opulent red fruit, briar and white pepper fill the glass. It is still very young and vibrant, it has not yet really developed the nuances that older Geyservilles tend to show. The palate is expansive and full, with more red fruit, spice and vanilla. At nearly 15% alcohol it is chewy, though not thick at all. The finish is long and spicy – the 2000 used more new oak (American) than it typically does. Great wine – and in no hurry at all. Drink if you like ‘em brawny or hold.

***Twomey Cellars, Napa Valley merlot, 2003: Lovely and wonderfully approachable. The 2003 vintage was hardly a blockbuster, allowing the wines to develop early. This wine is already open knit and very giving, showing lush plum and red fruit, violet, lavender and milk chocolate. Some nice rose petal nuances. Very pretty and wonderful with a cheese course. The palate is lush and friendly and the tannins are fine, sweet and long. Lavish wine. Delicious.

***Turnbull Wine Cellars, Estate Napa Valley cabernet, 2004: A huge crowd pleaser. Very accessible and yummy – this wine has all of the right elements all brought together in one bottle. Even if a touch soft, the wine sports an excellent fruit profile, tobacco, spice, a smidge of mushroom and mint chocolate to add to the complexity. Maybe a bit of a recipe wine, but yummy nonetheless. The palate is voluptuous, welcoming and coating, the finish fine and sweet, with a touch of espresso bean. It is like the Tom Hanks of wines; not intensely serious…but how can you not like it! Great value at $38. (By the way…if you want to taste the more serious side of the Turnbull estate try the wine Thomas Rivers Brown is making from up there for the Maybach family. Wow!)

***Medlock Ames, Red, Bell Mountain Alexander Valley, 2003: Delish. 50/50 estate cab merlot. Young but open knit and welcoming. Nice supporting structure. Very Sonoma Mountain-driven terroir elements of ripe red fruit, pipe tobacco, truffle, hazelnut chocolate and baking spices. Lush, round and inviting. Yummy!

***R.H. Coutier, Tradition Brut champagne, NV: Lovely for non vintage champagne. Really singular signature of freshly baked apple pie – cinnamon, vanilla, baked apples, baking spices. All the elements are there. An added element of custard-y, candied citrus zest on the brisk finish is a welcome surprise. Nice acids. Very nice indeed!

Sunday, December 2, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#41


Wine of Merit: *****Laurel Glen Estate Sonoma Mountain Reserve, cabernet sauvignon, 1990: Just writing the wine notes for this gives me goose bumps. A quick story: Patrick Campbell, the owner and winemaker at Laurel Glen, has only made a few reserves in the history of this storied winery. He has never submitted them for review. For the 1990 he bottled only 300 magnums, which he only sold through his customer list and gave to friends. And he also bottled a handful of Methuselahs – or 6 liter bottles. And he gave me one as a gift (I assisted him with the naming of one of his wines)! And we opened it for Thanksgiving 2007. I will forever be indebted. I have had this wine once before, over 10 years ago. It was truly an amazing and remarkable wine then. Funny thing, I went back to my notes and they were almost identical to the notes I am about to publish. Then, like now, I noted the signature elements that allow for a favorable comparison to the very best that Leoville Las Cases has ever had to offer – indeed Patrick has always made, in my opinion, very Bordelaise wines, with amazing depth, concentration and balance – the elements I most prize. With moderate coaxing, this wine reveals a whole cornucopia of nuances, loamy earth, truffle, deep red fruit, tar, Gaeta olive, melted licorice, baker’s chocolate. Wow. 15 minutes in, the wine is signing and downright youthful (I am sure the large format helped). Sensational. No surprise, this wine is only 12.5% alcohol, not fooling the palate with numbing thickness but instead relying on the natural weight and structure to provide great, indeed voluminous mouth feel, with more fruit, chocolate, olive and minerals. The finish is long and succulent, gaining power over time, youthful and still very strong. I am sure this wine is good for another 5 to 7 years at the least, but is amazing to drink right now. Thank you, Patrick!

****Aubert, Ritchie Vineyard, Sonoma Coast, chardonnay, 2004: Every bit as good as previously noted. Tonight it is the freshness that strikes me as particularly alluring. Sure, the wine is wonderfully nuanced and complex, sure the viscous oily mouth feel and weight connote a serious effort. Still, with everything this wine has going on, it is fresh and bright, not heavy handed at all. Really special. A delight.

***Medlock Ames, Bell Mountain, Alexander Valley rose, 2006: Different from most rose wines which start fresh and then degrade over time, this wine is actually getting better with a bit of bottle age. The flavors are integrating and the wine itself is becoming more harmonious…an even greater pleasure to drink. As noted, a wonderful food fine – I had this with some sushi and a groovy “Caribbean Roll” - spicy tuna, avocado and fried banana and walnut on top. Lovely.

***Clos Pegase, Hommage Artist Series, Napa Valley cabernet sauvignon, 1993: I am a sucker for Artist series labels. Mouton, Kenwood and yes Clos Pegase. While the latter two will never be confused for the former, the labels are beautiful and the wines are expertly crafted – and well worth purchasing. This wine has softened substantially since release but is absolutely not over the hill. In fact some mild coaxing releases lovely, nuanced red fruit, plum, cardamom and Asian spice from the glass. The palate has thinned slightly – offering red fruit, licorice root and nutmeg - but there is no drop off front to back and the finish is resolved but fine and very pleasant. A great wine to have with a yummy herbed soft cheese or a nice roasted bird. Delicious.

*++Deloach, RRV, chardonnay, 2004: This winery has gone through quite a bit of transformation. Initially quirky and making handcrafted wines (some very good some not) the winery was sold by the founders to Big Vino in 2003. Recently Greg LaFolette, he of Flowers and Tandem fame, has been making the wine. While not something to search out (the pinot is in fact something to avoid), the chardonnay is not all that bad –in a Costco wine around $12 kind of way. Not overblown, it is pleasant and well balanced. Hibiscus, pear and Meyer lemon. Not super concentrated…light on the palate but not thin. Finish shows some spice and more citrus. A wine that, if they were serving it at a Bar Mitvah, I would happily drink.

*+Rutz Cellars, Dutton Ranch, RRV pinot noir, 1993: I believe this was a very early attempt by the folks at Rutz…I can only hope the winemaking has improved. The issue with this wine is not that it has aged poorly – in fact my recollection of this wine on release is that it has actually improved a bit with time. Still, this wine is hot, disjointed and over manufactured. It does offer some nice notes of typical varietal fruit, black cherry liquor, vanilla and green tea. It is unfortunately more than a little over extracted, astringent with way too much oak making for a bitter attack and finish. Not very pleasant, though with air it softens a bit.

Monday, November 19, 2007

Wine Musings Is Turning 40!

Wine of Merit: ***+Chasseur, Van der Kamp vineyard, pinot noir, 1999: Ahhhh…finally. I have been hit and miss with Bill Hunter’s wines of late and worried that they really did not age well at all (they are so wonderful young). This is the exception. Van der Kamp vineyard makes great pinot noir (Siduri and Flowers come to mind) and this is a perfect expression of what it can offer. Wonderful, tea rose, black cherry, cassis and nutmeg aromas present themselves with a little coaxing. Green tea, more cherry fruit and minerals on the palate. Great structure and wonderful integration. A stately wine, with everything in the right place. Fine, furry tannins and a spice box finish. Essential pinot.

***+Keever Vineyards, Napa Valley cabernet sauvignon, 2004: Much has been made of this new winery's offerings of late – yet another new winery from retiring boomers who are now living their Napa Valley dreams. It is an Atlas Peak cab made by Celia Masyczek, she of Staglin and Scarecrow fame. So I broke down and grabbed a few bottles. Well, the hype is for the most part warranted. This is an extremely well made wine. Still very brawny and intense, the wine shows off great aromatics – scorched earth, violets, bittersweet chocolate and blue fruits. The palate is deep and mineral laden, with more chocolate and stone fruit. The finish is powerful but well integrated into the wine, not detracting from overall balance at all – and that no small feat given the wines 15%+ alcohol levels. This wine reminds me of a very well made Paulliac – maybe it is the Pontet Canet of Atlas Peak?! A wine (and AVA) to watch – Kongsgaard also makes cab here, as does Jocelyn Lonen.

**++Dutton Goldfield, Rued Vineyard, chardonnay, 2003: I am a big fan of Dan Goldfield. He is an aging hippie from Philly who loves the lifestyle that Sonoma affords him – and it shows in his wines. The Rued vineyard makes lovely chardonnay that typically exhibits bright, yellow peach, white floral elements and jazzy, tropical nuances. The body of the wine is tight and well-toned, offering complementary zest and ginger elements through a nice, long finish. A very nice, quaffable white.

**++Cline, Big Break vineyard, zinfandel, 1994: I keep these wines around to prove the point that zinfandel can age. Sure, not the 16% alcohol fruit bombs – they start pruney and get angrier as the years pass. But well crafted, balanced, lower alch versions achieve a lushness, maturity and complexity of fruit that makes these worth waiting for. Such is the case with the Cline Big Break. Mature plum and cherry notes, tar and violets whaft from the glass. Coating mouth feel with Rhone like elements of brier, smoke and bacon fat. Sweet, fine tannins on the finish. Lovely.

Rappsody, ToKalon / Dr. Crane vineyard, cabernet sauvignon, 2005: I review this wine mostly to talk about where it was made (Crushpad Wines) more than the wine itself – as only 25 cases were made and it is not for sale –and thus the notes are of little value (I will not rate the wine). This wine is something that a group of friends and I made at the hyper customized wine making experience that Crushpad offers (http://www.crushpadwines.com/). It was part of their “Cult Cabernet” program - the vineyard we selected our fruit from produces wines from Schrader and Harlan and Realm (all $125- $250 a bottle) amongst others. Further, the attention to wine making approximates those wineries best practices…thus the product should be similar. And to cap it off, you get to participate as much or as little as you want in the wine making process. What could be better?

Well, to paraphrase the great, late Lloyd Benson: “I know cult cabernets. I have cellared cult cabernets. You sir are no cult cabernet!” In all fairness, those wines are truly spectacular, often mind boggling wines...the best of the best. Our "baby cult" is absolutely a delicious bottle of wine – and well worth the $35 a bottle we invested at the time. Jammy blackberry and nuances of red fruit, balanced with forest floor and pine needles make this a wine a definite crowd pleaser. The body is still all baby fat, though if one concentrates you will get that yummy, chalky Oakville soil and chocolate mint along with nuance of picholine olive. Finish is starting to firm up and make more of a statement. It will be fun to check into this wine as it ages and develops as right now it is still very primal. When I receive my Harlan, Schrader and Realm allotments I will have a blind tasting with our cult-ish Rappsody and see where things shake out. I can’t wait! As for Crushpad – I would not hesitate to recommend the experience…revel in making your own high quality wine with your own label…and expect to get what you pay for times 2 (or more)!

Tuesday, November 6, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#39

Wine of Merit: *****Kongsgaard “The Judge” chardonnay, 2005: Order in the courtroom! This really is an absolutely spectacular wine. I really believe that anyone who has tired of chardonnay must revive / recalibrate his or her taste buds by sampling what John Kongsgaard puts together each and every year in his tete de cuvee of white wines. Everything about it is superlative; the nuanced, complex nose of clover honey, sage, lavender and bosc pear. The oily, viscous mouth feel that adds verbena and slate elements to the palate. The long, spicy, lemony finish that actually shows a zing of red grapefruit right at the end…wow. I love this wine and am happy to buy it year in and year out, even at its heady price of $125 (or $300-$500 after market) a pop. Well worth it.

****+Chateau Palmer, Margaux, Bordeaux 1995: I openly admit to being a total Palmer head. There is just something about the way it all comes together – it is at once pretty yet serious, lithe yet deep, nuanced yet massive - that just makes it one of the great wine experiences to be had. The 1995 is a wonderful wine. It does not have the layer upon layer of complexity that the 1983 or 1989 had. It is a bit more straightforward…but worthy nonetheless. Great Margaux red fruit, wonderful chalky minerals, violets and black licorice…truffles. Great weight, seamless integration, not showing really any age at all, perfect finish that is honed and muscular but still all in balance. A finely toned wine.

****Tenuta dell’Ornellaia, Bolgheri, 1997: My friend John Caldarella is on a mission to remind me of how wonderful Italian wines can be. He is succeeding. This is a great wine that has aged beautifully. For those not in the know, Ornellaia is a Bordeaux-like blend originally made by the Antinori family (I believe it has since been sold – anyone see Mondo Vino?). Out of the bottle this is a wild wine…showing smoke, grilled meat, truffle and ripe plum. Palate is coating and expansive with more super ripe fruit, black olive and tar. Finish is also full if not particularly remarkable. With time in the glass it settles down quite a bit, becoming more nuanced and much more red fruit driven. I think this wine is very much ready to drink right now….right at its peak.

****Rivers Marie, Napa Valley cabernet, 2004: I am crazy for Thomas Rivers Brown wines. Outpost, Rivers Marie (his own label), Schrader, Maybach…the list goes on. Thomas is better known for the pinot he makes with this label, but I know what he does with cab and thus was expecting great stuff. I was not disappointed. Wow- this is delicious! Huge nose of blackberry, plum, bittersweet chocolate, scorched earth. This style can easily go over the top (see Husic notes) but this rides the wave perfectly, keeping it just in check. The palate is expansive and generous, adding black pepper and licorice root. Finish is long and still very young. This is a dynamite effort that may reward cellaring…but will be difficult to keep you hands off in the short term. Kudos TRB!

***+Araujo estate grappa, 2003: And now for something completely different…grappa! I love Araujo grappa – it is my favorite of all grappas, better than Nonino, better than their Piccolit. In fact, I would say that this is a great grappa to try if you think you do not like grappa. It is not astringent at all. Lovely, nuanced espresso bean and vanilla notes, with a touch of white flowers. Some heat but not too much. And smooooooth? Wow, the texture and mouth feel are wonderful. Even the finish is great, adding a bit of white pepper and more spice from the oak. A great after meal digestif.

***+Siro Pacenti Brunello di Montalcino, 1999: Another installment of Caldarella on Italian wine. Delicious. Bright raspberry fruit, saddle leather, licorice root. At the top of the maturity bell curve. Expansive and palate coating, with a fine, sweet tannic finish. A statesman of a wine. I could drink a lot of this!

***+Castel Giocondo Brunello di Montalcino, 1999: Lovely and very mature. This wine shows red and black fruit, morel mushrooms, a nice black olive element and toast. Not thinning on the palate but clearly mature. Lovely mineral element mid palate. This is a dynamite wine that offers great nuance and really got better and better as the evening progressed.

***+Frogs Leap Napa Valley cabernet, 2001: Another surprise. I have always enjoyed Frogs leap wines (if you have never had their “Late Leap” Sauternes-like dessert wine, you should…the packaging alone is worth the effort) but never thought of them as more than restaurant fare. This wine was much better than that. Very nice depth, with good grip and balance, this wine is still youthful but very much in alignment. Black, berry fruit, tar, minerals and violets create an alluring mélange. Again, the palate shows nice heft and balance with more black fruit and some briar. No drop off to the finish, which offers fine, sweet tannins. A very worthy wine from a very worthy vintage.

***Newton Unfiltered chardonnay, 2002: Flamboyant and fun. This is a no holds barred chardonnay. It offers over the top aromas of lemon meringue, hibiscus, marzipan and grilled peach. The palate is lush, perhaps a tad flabby, adding elements of linseed and café au lait. Nice, candied citrus zest finish with more toasty, spicy oak. Honestly, it was a bit of a surprise to me as the 2003 is a much more balanced, nuanced wine. Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em.

Monday, October 8, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#38

Wine of Merit: ****Chateau Gruaud Larose, St. Julien, Bordeaux, 2000: I opened this by mistake, thinking it a 1990. It was a fortuitous mistake. Huge and brawny, this wine and the 86 Barton really are not that dissimilar, though one is the before and the other is the after. This wine makes me think of a bottomless well…black, deep, endless. The nose is surprisingly generous, offering that Gruaud funk, blackberry, briar, tar…great stuff. The structure suggests this wine will reward cellaring for decades. Superlative. You know, it is a pity Bordeaux is costing so much these days…the wines are really worthy and in a completely different class from even the best Cali cabernets.


***++Chateau Leoville Barton, St. Julien, Bordeaux, 1986: Ok – let’s get one thing out in the open right from the start…I LOVE well crafted St. Julien wines. So rich, so powerful and yet so nuanced...just wonderful. This wine delivers. Great color and depth. Aromas of blackberry preserves, cassis, nuances of iodine, minerals, forest bottom. Palate initially seems to have thinned a bit, but then opens up to reveal more black fruit, licorice with a full, coating feel. Tannins are still very much present but wonderfully integrated. Righteous.


***+Blackbird Vineyards, Proprietary Red Wine, Oak Knoll, 2004: This is a merlot based wine made by Sarah Gott that has been garnering quite a bit of praise lately. It is, in fact delicious. Not the “new world Pomerol” that they suggest it is – instead I would liken it to old school Matanzas Creek (of which I am a big fan): Deep, blue, red fruit based, great concentration and balance, generous use of new oak. Great notes of black currant, dark chocolate, violets…great stuff. Full, coating mouthfeel, lots of depth right to the finish, sweet, long tannins. Dynamite wine. At $80, not sure if it is a wine I will buy in every vintage…but it does not disappoint.


***+PlumpJack Reserve, Oakville, cabernet sauvignon, 2004: See Husic…sort of. This wine exhibits a bit more balance and nuance, though the base notes are very much the same. I won’t repeat the notes (they really are very similar) other than to say that these are wines that can be had with a nice cheese plate or chocolate dessert and I am sure will really show well. Fun wines that I am glad to drink…but not to cellar.


***DeLille Cellars, Chaluer Estate Blanc, Washington, 2006: A Sauvignon blanc / Semillon mix that blinded I would have guessed white Graves. Really super, fresh lemon zest, slate, mission fig a touch of petrol. With time, more of the barrel fermented Semillion shows up adding toast, almond and vanilla. Bracing acids but not zippy, great mouthfeel…a serious white that is a great food wine. Reminds me a bit of the Kalin Semillion. At $30 a pop it is very much worth seeking out.


***Medlock Ames, Bell Mountain, Alexander Valley, sauvignon blanc, 2006: I had not tried this wine before…and I was blown away! One of a select few that set the standard for California sauvignon blanc (I would place it right up there with Peter Michael Après Midi and Rochioli Estate). Fresh, lithe, bright and energized, this sauvignon blanc has wonderful, sweet lichee, white peach, honeysuckle, vanilla and lavender notes. Not cloying or racy, this has surprising depth and grace for a wine so young, with dynamite, clean minerality from mid palate to finish. Good stuff.

***Husic Vineyards, Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa Valley, 2002: Husic is one of those new-to-the-scene $100 a pop cabernet wineries that have sprouted up all over the place in Napa Valley, as boomers age out of the work force and decide to pursue their life long dream of hob knobbing with Heidi Barrett and Francis Ford Coppola (See Revana, Vineyard 29, etc.). Good by me! In any case, this wine seems to follow the ultra-ripe, extended maceration, high ferment temp, lots of new oak, full throttle strategy that generates big scores among some. It is delicious. Lush, plum and prune Danish, almond paste (hamantashen! How often do you see that in a wine note?) notes. Lots of hazelnut, espresso bean and chocolate, along with cardamom and cigar box. Briar. The mouth feel is lush and velvety and unwinds to offer blackberry preserve and licorice. Finish is round and sweet. I appreciate it, just not really my style.

**++Chasseur, Lorenzo’s vineyard, chardonnay, 2003: Jonesing for a positive Chassuer experience…this wine delivers. Initially coy and even a bit funky, it opens to reveal big, ripe chardonnay fruit, butterscotch and baked pear. Lush, round mouthfeel. Some minerals on the finish with a slight edge of bitterness. More Corton than Mersault, I like this wine but it seems almost one dimensional, so round and buttery is the perfumed nose. Reminds me of a Beringer PR chardonnay – not an ager but good.

Monday, September 24, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#37

Wine of Merit: ***+Capiaux, Chimera, Sonoma County pinot noir, 2004: Lovely. Made by Sean Capiaux, who also makes the O’Shaughnessy wines over in Napa. This wine is made from a few different vineyards including Gary’s vineyard, Pisoni and a few others. Delicious with good weight, depth and seamless integration. Red and blue fruits, minerals, truffle and exotic tea, coupled with a firm but integrated tannic backbone make this a candidate for cellaring. Mouth feel is creamy but not soft, acids help structure but do not make the wine zippy. Oak ads spice but is far from overdone. Nice!

***Medlock Ames Rose, Alexander Valley, 2006: I am a huge Medlock Ames fan. I dig everything they do and the enthusiasm with which they do it…and their wines are delicious. This is no exception. Their 2006 rose (of cabernet and merlot, I think) is bright and fresh. Not overly exuberant, it offers watermelon, rosehip, celery and anise notes. A dynamite food wine, the palate is invigorating with a delicious spicy and long finish. Have it with a piece of cold, leftover grilled chicken and some roasted rosemary new potatoes while watching the Eagles KILL the Lions…it is especially delicious like that (even with those ugly throw backs)!

***75 Wine Company, Amber Knoll vineyard, Lake County , 2004: This is a wine made by the Beckstoffer family, major players in vineyard ownership and management throughout Napa Valley. This wine is, interestingly, not from there but from Lake County, up in Mendocino. I found the wine delicious if fairly simple and straightforward. Big, thick generous notes of black licorice, cassis and black cherry liqueur waft from the glass. The body is medium to heavy weight, with a velvety, layered palate feel. The finish is youthful but round and sweet, with yummy, earthy spice. I understand this wine to go for less than $20 a pop and as such is a steal.

**++Owen Roe, Walla Walla cabernet sauvignon, 2005: Another young, brawny cabernet, this one from the seven hills vineyard up in Washington. I found this wine fun if not very multi dimensional. Thick, roasted black fruit, cardamom, toffee and vanilla. Very much still showing a lot of baby fat, this wine is also lavishly oaked with at the very least a medium plus toast, showing caramel and butter on a sweet, round finish. I would hold this for a year just to see if it grows into all of the flesh that it is showing right now.

**++Chasseur, Sylvia’s, Dutton Vineyard, Sonoma, pinot noir, 1999: I am a huge Chasseur fan. But I have found that Bill Hunter’s wines tend to thin with age – not adding complexity or maintaining structure. This wine is lovely if light bodied. Bright, bing cherry, vanilla, sage and cardamom, intermingled with elements of potpourri edge there way to the rim of the glass. The body shows a touch of thinness in the mid palate where some green wood elements show through. The finish is of medium length and spicy.

Friday, September 21, 2007

Wine Musings LTD: Amber Ridge Part 2

Well, things have heated up…literally. Out of cold soak, my Amber Ridge pinot noir was gently warmed up to room temp. Multiple, daily punch downs continue to occur. After a couple of days warming up (when it is also typical for natural yeasts to start the fermentation process) we inoculated with ASM, a yeast that is known to allow for excellent color and an additional spicy note. Yum – we are starting to make wine!

Note the fermentation graph…see how brix goes down as temp goes up. Each day, as we get past zero brix, we taste the juice, looking for depth and intensity of aromas and flavors but also looking for structure imparted by the skins before we press. Here is Chris Nelson, my consulting winemaker, tasting through with me…A day or two more, Chris! We press on the 20th! At that point we will barrel down the free run juice (30% new Francios Freres French oak, MT) and the press wine, inoculate for malo lactic and begin the aging process in earnest. More to come…

Friday, September 7, 2007

Wine Musings LTD: 2007 Amber Ridge Pinot Update

Having mostly focused on the Ghost of Vino Past (older vintages) and the Ghost of Vino Present (current vintages and barrel samples) we now move to our crystal ball and look in on the Ghost of Vino Future (the upcoming vintage)!

As some of you may know, this year I am making a pinot noir from the Amber Ridge vineyard in the Russian River Valley. Other wineries that make pinot from Amber Ridge include Kosta Browne and Siduri – both mid 90 point wines according to the guru Robert Parker. Having recently completed a syrah from White Hawk vineyard in Santa Barbara and a cabernet sauvignon from To Kalon in Napa with some success, I thought it time to experiment with the “heart break grape”. I will therefore give you updates from time to time on how it is progressing. Oh, and the best news; the wine is for sale to friends by the case at my manufacturing cost. First 22 to raise their hands get a case at $300, or $25 a bottle (plus shipping). The release party will be at my house and we will crack great vino with some yummy food and celebrate the day. To the update:

Amber Ridge supports three Dijon clones of pinot noir – clones 115, 667 and 777. Each offers different nuances of taste and structure. It is typical that each will mature at different rates and be picked at different times. Not this year! After a nice fairly text book spring and early summer, the heat began to rise in the RRV in early September. And so did the sugar levels. As it turned out, all three varietals came in on September 4th, at 25 – 26.2 degrees brix. Crops were light but berries looked great (and more importantly tasted great) and skins were thick (images are of actual fruit from this weeks harvest!). My pinot noir lot was expertly sorted with the help of team Selover (my sis and brother-in-law) – who can attest to the “deliciousity” of the fruit. We are on the right track! What will follow will be at least five days of cold soak with daily punch downs before we begin fermentation. This will allow for colors and good flavors to be imparted from the skins to the juice. More updates will come once we warm up from cold soak and start fermenting.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#36


Wine of Merit: ***++Schloss Gobelsburg Urgenstein riesling, Weingut, 2005: Another Austrian Riesling winner, this from the young vines of two grand cru vineyards. This wine could probably use some bottle aging, but is still a pleasure to drink in its youth. Bright, zippy acids accompany focused, delineated tropical fruit, lichee, lemon blossom and freshly mown grass elements. Excellent mineral content. The finish is long and spicy. Dynamite wine from an excellent vintage. A lovely wine for now and for later.

***++Brewer Clifton Blanc des blanc, Santa Maria Valley, 1993 (late disgorged): I am a huge fan of this wine and it continues to surprise and delight. Like an effervescent Corton Charlemagne, this wine offers tapioca, lemon curd and linseed notes, adding honey, waxed fruit and tobacco now. Palette is alive if mellowing, with minerals and more citrus notes. In a world awash with average bubbly, this is a great change up. Stately and yet yummy at the same time. Too good.

***++Flowers Sonoma Coast, pinot noir, 2002: This on the other hand is a no brainer. Wonderful, youthful, seamless, not over the top but with plenty of stuffing. I tend to dig the cooler climate of the Sonoma Coast for pinot – and Flowers knows Sonoma Coast pinot. Similar in style to some of the better Williams Selyem, this wine is well endowed without ever coming across as heavy or obvious. Great concentration and depth, with just the right amount of oak nuances to accompany the varietal fruit, cola, cream and tea rose notes. Palette coating integrated front to back. Really an easy wine to enjoy and very worthy of compliment. Nice!

***Rochioli Russian River Valley sauvignon blanc, 2005: Righteous. I have always felt that Rochioli and Peter Michael make the quintessential California sauvignon blanc, though they are very different in style. This wine is all about purity and focus. Bright grapefruit and guava notes zap themselves right at you from the glass, with a touch of grassy lavender. The palate is lively and crisp, adding slightly under ripe honey dew, though this vintage does show some vanilla and almond notes from the wood barrels. Quenching and delicious. P.S. A recent tasting of the 2006 showed everything the 2005 had…just more. It adds a plus for a ***+.


***Nicolas Joly, Clos de la Culee de Sarrant, Savennieres, 1985: The Prestige Chenin Blanc bottling from this Loire valley winery, which has the unusual distinction of having its own appellation. This particular vintage represents the first bottling after the winery converted to biodynamic farming (Moooo!). Vibrant and surprisingly youthful color and clarity. Somewhat restrained nose of honey, clover, wet hay and quince. The palate is round and expansive, offering many of the same fruit elements with the addition of a nice mineral note. The finish was silky but beginning to fade. Elegant.

***Bodega R. Lopez Heredia, Vina Tondia, Gran Riserva, Ribera del duero, 1981: I think this is a wine that either really speaks to you – or doesn’t. I mean, I bet the Brits really dig this wine. It is old and nuanced in kind of more dead than alive ways. But I understand it. Faded garnet to the rim, this sage wine offers red, plumy, spicy fruit, saddle leather, panforte and graphite nose, again all ebbing rather than flowing. The palate is completely resolved but again offers some interesting garden vegetable and mature fruit elements to accompany a lovely mineral signature that is seamless front to back. A wine to appreciate if not enjoy…

Sunday, July 29, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#35


Wine of Merit: ****Clos des Papes, Chateauneuf du Pape, 1995: The bomb. This wine is so multi-layered and delicious…Paul Avril is a master. The wine is amazingly still a smidge tight, though a bit of swirling shows big notes of menthol, sage, jammy blackberry preserves, licorice root, black pepper and a touch of green olive. More blackberry, grilled meats, a touch of heat on the palate – great depth and concentration. A long, firm, peppery finish. Wow. A meal in a glass. So good. This wine is wonderful now and will be great later. Impressive.

****Diamond Creek, Gravelly Meadow, Diamond Mountain cabernet sauvignon, 1981: A continuing tribute to Al Brounstein. Amazingly youthful and full of energy. The nose is almost flamboyant, with deep red and black fruit, minerals, cassis, some autumnal notes. Really super. The palate is coating and velvety, mouth filling and deep. Perfect integration through to the lively, furry finish. Drink or hold…this wine is going nowhere in a hurry. Great wine. Thanks again, Al.

****Foxen Santa Maria Valley, pinot noir, 2005: Makes me feel like sayin’ Foxy! This is nothing short of a wonderful wine. Laser-like purity and focus of black and Queen Anne cherry fruit, cinnamon, cola and licorice root…it is a right hand upper cut to the jaw (thanks JC!)…it is so forceful and intense. Nothing really nuanced yet about this wine, it is tightly wound but clearly built to be a stately wine with great varietal characteristics, wonderful integration and amazing length. And to think it doesn’t even crack 14% alcohol! I swear I could drink this stuff every night. So exciting! At $30 a pop, it should be illegal.

****Rochioli, Russian River Valley, pinot noir, 2005: This wine is all elegance…which is no surprise as Rochioli is all about elegance in every wine it makes. Creamy, nuanced red fruits, cardamom, rose petal and a touch of earth, this is a stately wine. Deftly balanced and seamlessly integrated, with no drop off at all across the palette, this wine will reward bottle aging with even greater nuance and sophistication. A wine I would be proud to serve on any occasion. Bravo!

***++Chateau Haut Brion, Pessac Leognan, Bordeaux 1998: This is a wonderful wine. The nose is ethereal: Expansive. Deep elements of black raspberry, graphite, cedar, minerals, cassis all integrate together to offer a tour de force of what great Bordeaux could offer. The palate is not quite as forthcoming, showing a more mature, resolved signature with more berry fruit, minerals and a slight drop off mid palate. The finish is firm and decisive. Superlative.

***+Medlock Ames Bell Mountain vineyard, Alexander Valley, chardonnay, 2005: I loved this wine. Lithe and lively, this is much more Mersault than new world chard. Laden with minerals, hibiscus and Anjou pear, this wine has no flab. The palette offers more of that delicious, laser focused minerals with bright Meyer lemon zest. Whatever oak is present is restrained and completely integrated. Delicious.

***+Domaine de Chevalier, Pessac Leognan, Bordeaux Blanc, 2002: I love white Graves. This is a super interesting, complex white Bordeaux. Honey dew, petrol, verbena and key lime all converge to offer a sophisticated signature on the nose. The palate shows more white flowers, clover and cut grass and a caramel / vanilla note that matchers the floral characteristics. Lively if somewhat round, this wine is delicious and worthy of attention all by itself.

***+Shea Vineyard Wine Cellars, Estate vineyard, Willamette Valley pinot noir, 2003: Hard to make bad wine from the Shea vineyard. It has great bones! I have enjoyed this wine in the past and it still presents very youthfully and full of promise. Deep, Willamette red and blackberry compote fruit, with forest floor notes and some nice, wafty church incense. The palette is expansive and almost lush, with big velvety red fruit, chocolate and a touch of rosemary. The finish is long and fine. A winner.

***Col Solare, Columbia Valley, red wine 2001: That crazy Antinori family. They are like truffle pigs when it comes to finding winemaking opportunities. Here they partner with Chateau St. Michelle to make a lovely, smooth talkin’ meritage from Washington state. Mostly cab, merlot and with syrah and malbec thrown in for good measure. As such, the wine is jammy, blackberry and plum flavors, thinning slightly in the mid palate. Lavish oak notes add mocha and vanilla, as well as fine, Asian spice on the finish. A very nice wine to have with some grilled red meat on a warm summer evening.

***Deutz, Blanc de Blanc, champagne, 1998: Yummy and fresh. Fresh, Macintosh apples fill the glass. Yeasty and warm, this wine is delicious, with focused apple and nutmeg notes and baking spice. Delicious and welcoming….this is a warm, welcoming wine that will be a crowd pleaser whenever it is served. Good stuff.

**++Diatom, Clos Pepe, Santa Rita Hills Chardonnay, 2005: I think this is made by Greg Brewer, of Brewer Clifton and Melville fame. While I know these folks do not make shy wines, I was shocked to see that this wine purports to have 15.7% alcohol. Once opened, however, the wine was lively if not crisp, with a sweetness on the nose and palate that suggested residual sugar. Aromas of honeydew, gardenia, and sweet clover honey waft from the glass. The palate is indeed expansive and fleshy, with beechnut and citrus zest but not fat. The finish is long and spicy, showing off some lavish oak notes. Very nice if somewhat of an obvious style.

**+Bjornstad Cellars, Porter Bass vineyard, chardonnay, 2005: Greg Bjornstad has had a hand in some of the better chards and pinots in California, notably DuMol, Kistler, Flowers and Kosta Browne, amongst others. This wine is not really like those. Lean and crisp, this has a young Chablis like lime, green apple and sweet pea nose. The palate instead is zippy and a bit bracing, almost a touch under ripe. The accompanying lemon curd and marzipan notes do not really hold up against the acid, creating a bit of a hole in the middle. The finish has bite and is a touch astringent. All in all, not bad.

Sunday, July 15, 2007

Wine Musings #34

Wine of Merit: ***++Demeter Zoltan, Tokaji Furmint, 2001: Zoltan Demeter is considered something of a young gun in Tokaj – he accepts no foreign investment and makes wine as he feels it should be made. If this wine is any indication, he has it figured out. This is a late harvest, sauterne styled wine, with wonderful purity, depth and focus. Bright apricot, Lichee nut, honey, mandarin orange…the flavors are focused, crisp vibrant and wonderfully integrated across a lively palate. Really super and a great find. While I do not profess great knowledge of Hungarian wines, this is clearly a winner and bodes well for further exploration!

***+Kalin DD Sonoma pinot noir, 1997: I have tasted this wine before and found it tired. Not so today. Delicious, sophisticated, wonderful varietal notes. The bottle age adds some nuance of a floral tisane to the nose, tree bark, along with pretty, delicate red fruit and spice. The body of the wine is still very much firm and intact and, at least today, this wine is presenting at its peak. Really wonderful and another example of why Kalin makes just superb wines (try their Semillion too – it is unique and wonderful).

***Brogan Cellars Russian River Valley, pinot noir, 2005: Made by Burt Williams daughter Margi. These wines lack the finesse and balance of the WS wines but are delicious none the less. Deep, deep dark, chocolate covered black cherry notes, cola, peppermint…this wine is aggressively fruit forward and extracted for maximum affect. Fat on the palate with a nice round mouth feel and style-y, spicy finish, I would recommend this wine for the shorter to mid term. Nice!

***Alloro Vineyard, Estate, Willamette Valley, pinot noir, 2004: Wow. This is a serious, old school rustic pinot. After so many cherry fruit, cola driven wines this is a stand out for its willingness to be different. More Pommard than RRV, this Willamette wine offers loamy top soil, bay leaf, green olive, tar and grilled meats and lavender along with powerful red fruit notes. Full but maybe a smidge racy on the palate, the finish is firm and has some pucker to it. Huh. A wine to be admired and probably laid done for a bit.

***Orin Swift, The Prisoner, Napa Valley, 2004: This is a wine that makes no bones about what it is up to: This is about fun – a zin cab syrah mix that tastes great. Brambly, black berry fruit. Toned down a bit since release, adding a bit more sophistication and nuance – you can now pick out the minerals, autumn leaves and mint – it is still exuberant and showy. Yummy in the short term – better than I remember it.

**La Jota, Howell Mountain cabernet sauvignon, 1991: Many folks consider La Jota to be kind of a poor man’s Dunn. I have never thought so. While it does often possess that austere structure and black, brambly mountain fruit, I have never found it to have the balance and integration, let alone the depth, of Randy Dunn’s wine. And structure with a lack of balance is a hollow promise. Case in point this 1991. It has aged itself into a crotchety, lean mountain cab. The fruit has matured and developed more redness. The aromas have mellowed, adding some green olive and rosemary notes. The palate has thinned, still showing bramble, pine and chalk in reserve and the finish can still take the enamel off of your teeth. A slightly better than average wine which has matured to just average, even from this excellent vintage.

***++Silver Oak, Alexander Valley cabernet sauvignon, 2000: It has become fashionable to make fun of Silver Oak over recent years, mostly because of the lavish amounts of NAO that it uses and its recipe driven wine making style. Net/net is that this is a delicious wine from an otherwise difficult vintage. Fresh, lively fruit driven style offering excellent concentration and depth with cigar box and toasty vanilla. Not as much of the signature Alexander green olive element that frankly I think makes this wine more interesting than the Napa. More jammy, berry fruit on the palate with some smoke and minerals and yes, lots of mocha / café latte from the new oak. Finish is deep and long. Dynamite wine. I was glad to enjoy it!

***+Molly Dooker, Enchanted Path, Shiraz Cabernet, McLaren Vale, 2005: Made by the folks who until recently brought you Marquis Phillips wines from down under. This is one of those full throttle, high extract wines that Robert Parker gives ridiculous scores to (and wins the all world label contest - great stuff, right?). I cracked it open just to see what the hype was about. All in all, not bad, though not my cup of tea – or should I say prune juice. In fact, the wine has almost a prune juice color – deep, dark and brooding. Super fat and heady (16% alcohol) this wine has aromas of candied black cherry, crème de cassis and yes prune Danish. On the palate there is an even greater sense of baked, candied fruit, almost like a panforte or a shoefly pie kinda thing, though it is remarkably lively for the weight. The finish is strong but fine and sweet as well. Fun wine, not a wine I will be buying by the case.

****Aubert, Ritchie Vineyard chardonnay, RRV, 2004: I have posted on this wine before, but it was drinking so well tonight I thought it deserved the bump. Wonderful intensity and nuanced aromas of buttered popcorn, linseed oil and pineapple. Great complexity on the palate with liquid minerals and marzipan accompanying the fruit and lemon zest. While in the past I would give the nod to the Ramey effort form this vineyard, tonight this wine nudges ahead. If you have it in the cellar, stand it up (it is very cloudy) and then giver ‘er a pour. Good stuff.

Saturday, June 30, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#33

Wine of Merit: ***+Phillippe Pacelet Gevrey-Chambertin 1er cru "La Perrière" 2004: A wine I bought on the recommendation of Crush Wines and Spirits in NYC…a wine store quickly becoming a go to source for great wine. Phillippe Pacalet is I believe more of the new generation in Burgundy wine making – and it is apparent for the good and for the bad in his wine. This bottling has amazing purity and focus. The varietal fruit characteristics are perfect and intense. Dark, lush, black cherry, green tea, spice box and cola notes. A wonderful creaminess to the palate, along with more red fruit and nutmeg / clove spice. Absolutely delicious and a pleasure to drink. It has, however, in my opinion lost its old world charm. Blind I would have guessed RRV by one of the boutique producers. No way is this Burgundy! And yet…A lovely wine that I will drink with pleasure. When I want the noise and the funk…I guess we will always have Ampeau!

***+Flowers Andreen Gale, Sonoma Coast pinot noir, 2001: Elegance with stature. Perfumed, lovely Sonoma coast fruit, deep, red fruit, cola, lavender, pine needles and spearmint. Effusive but perfectly aligned and integrated. Lush, creamy palate with black cherry, nutmeg and cinnamon spice. Loong, menthol finish with laser focused eucalyptus. Best now, right at its peak. Fine indeed.

***+Mount Mary, Lilydale valley, Quintet, 1994: Something of a cult classic, Mount Mary is an insiders wine and considered by many to be the very best wine Down Under has to offer. This wine blew me away on release. It is a typical Bordeaux blend with an Aussie slant. Made back in the day when 13% alcohol was considered more than enough. It has aged quite a bit since then, showing a smidge of thinning at the rim, though the hue is still deep plum. The nose is a total ringer for a mature Sant Julien from a very good if slightly uneven vintage, say 1988. Garrigue, sois bois, some barnyardy elements, blackberry preserve, violets, mint, mature plum, tobacco…it’s all there. Even the grilled bell pepper that makes me think Gruaud Larose. Downright juicy. Palate shows more, juicy fruit, but is a tad thin mid palate and I taste a greenness that suggests American oak. Finish is sweet, spicy and adds some minerals, along with more telltale greenness. Delicious, but I don’t think it will get better with time.

***Failla, Alban Vineyards Viognier, 2005: Ehren Jordan just doesn’t make bad wine. The Alban vineyard is known for producing top quality viognier fruit. This is a dynamite viognier – and I find most new world viognier cloying and obvious. This instead is sophisticated and feminine, offering perfumed, guava, marzipan, honeysuckle and lavender notes that fill the glass, with an underlying hint of slate. The palate is smooth and viscous, with honeyed yellow peach, more minerals and asian spice. Great served cold with herbed cheeses and smoked salmon. If you eat trief, I guess seafood would work.

***Ridge, Dusi Vineyard ATP zinfandel, 1995: Another of the Advance Tasting Program (ATP) wines from ridge. 100% zinfandel. This was a bit of a SNAFU wine when it was made – the intention was to make it a late harvest, 40 degree brix type wine. Instead ripening stalled at 26 degrees brix and so they simply harvested it thinking that it would be a full throttle, in your face, short shelf life zin. So I didn’t hold out much hope. Instead it was actually lovely. Deep, dark, sweet brambly plum fruit, black pepper and some talc dominate the nose. The palate is still lively and round, not as flabby and dried up as the nearly 15 alcohol would have had me believe. Finish is spicy and resolved but not thin. A lucky find.

***Ridge, Lytton Estate ATP zinfandel, 1994: This was meant to be an age-worthy wine – a field blend that includes 100 year old head pruned zin as well as carignane and petite sirah - and it delivered. Bordeaux like complexity offers red berry fruit, cassis and pine needle as well as sois bois. Maturing palate feel is smooth and integrated, nicely balanced. A very nice glass of wine to drink now or hold, though I don’t think it will improve.

***Williams Selyem, Russian River Valley pinot noir, 2000: I think this wine represents the moment in time when Ed and Burt cashed out and left the winery to the Pellegrini folks. As such, I guess they went out with a whimper as opposed to a bang. I suggest this in comparison to WS pinots that I have had in the past. Actually, by itself it is a rather nice wine, especially given the difficult vintage. Very mature with bricking at the rim, the wine has a prune Danish and black cherry liqueur nose, with a nuance of green tea and cinnamon. The palate is lavish and full, maybe even creamy. The finish offers Asian spice, pretty much resolved. Smoke ‘em if you got ‘em.

***Jocelyn Lonen Napa Valley cabernet sauvignon, 2004: A quick update on this wine as I have posted on it recently. It is drinking great. Lush, deep red and black fruit, cassis and chocolate, a touch of truffle…no one will confuse this for a Ch Montrose but everyone should appreciate this for the delicious, palate coating mouthful of wine that it represents. At $35 a pop, this still represents an excellent value. Yum!

Friday, June 1, 2007

Wine Musings Vol#32


Wine of Merit: ***++Ramey, Ritchie Vineyard, Russian River Valley, chardonnay, 2003: This Ramey guy may be on to something (David Ramey has been the winemaker at some of Cali’s finest including Dominus, Rudd and Matanzas Creek). Certainly, he knows how to source fruit. The Ritchie vineyard does wonderful things with chardonnay and this is no exception. Perfumed, exotic, white flowers, bosc pears, honeysuckle and lavender waft up from the glass. Beautiful palate which includes lemon zest and vanilla, with asian spice. Lovely, integrated finish. Can’t beat it.

***Clos Pegase, Hommage Artist Series Reserve, cabernet sauvignon 1992: “How do you make a small fortune in the wine business?” asks Jan Schrem when queried about his success, “Start with a large fortune and work your way down!” Here is a guy that is clearly passionate about wine – and it shows in his bottlings. This is clearly a mature wine, though the color is a vibrant garnet to the rim. The nose is nuanced, with pomegranate, mint, lavender, sweet clover honey and powdery necco wafers. The palate offers more red fruit, Malabar pepper and asian spices, though it is clearly thinning. The finish is sweet and furry and of medium length. A very pleasant wine that can be enjoyed now.

**+Robert Sinskey, vin gris of pinot noir, 2006: Nice. Bright acids, muted strawberry fruit, lychee nut and pineapple juice notes. Light on the palate, a nuance of provencal herbs, with a nice fruity finish. Not bad!

***Cornerstone Cellars, Howell Mountain Beatty Ranch, Napa Valley cabernet sauvignon, 1991: Mature color, evolved nose of soy, stewed stone fruit, plumy, chocolate covered raisins. Fairly full on the palate, mostly red and some black berry fruit. Integrated and fairly balanced. A wine to drink now. Delicious in the short term.

***+Ramey, Hudson Vineyard chardonnay, 2002: Wow. Lovely, effusive perfumed nose of honeysuckle, citrus and a beautiful lavender note. Full and coating on the palate. Notes of vanilla and more candies citrus. Great, spicy, firm finish. Super classy chard!

***++Barnett Vineyards, Rattlesnake Hill, cabernet sauvignon, 1994: Killer. Mature cab color and nose. Perfumey and sexy. Church incense, cassis, cigar tobacco, black fruit. Velvety, palate coating, black Malabar pepper, blackberry, boysenberry, chocolate and some tar. Really special. Sweet, fine tannins. Drink or hold. Great wine.

Thursday, May 24, 2007

Wine Musings LTD: Angwin to Zahtila Day 3

Day 3 was our final day in Napa and we meant to get the most out of it. Our schedule spanned from Atlas Peak to Howell Mountain so there was no dallying!

Our first stop was the brand spankin’ new tasting room of Jocelyn Lonen, at what seemed to be the very Peak of Atlas Peak road. What a view! The lovely and gracious Brandi Jocelyn Pack was there to greet us, give us a tour of the estate and pour some of her beautiful Pritchard Hill cabernets. It is wonderful to see someone who cares so much about making great wine while incorporating it into a life that still centers around friends and family. I encourage anyone going to the area to visit Brandi and sign up for her newsletter. These are worthy wines at wonderful price points. Fantastic.

In an odd twist, Brandi sells her estate fruit (which had been under contract for some time) while sourcing cabernet sauvignon and cab franc from the Krupps. That is, however, soon to change. Jamie Whetstone, of Turley and Whetstone fame, is Brandi’s winemaker and his commitment to outstanding, deep cabernet is immediately apparent. To the wines:

***+Jocelyn Lonen Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon, 2003: Wow. Really lovely with pronounced aromatics right from the first pour. More pronounced cab franc elements of mocha, truffle, grilled meats and violets accompany great, rich red fruit notes. Wonderful richness again on the palate with superb depth and mineral notes. Sweet, long, spicy finish. Sexy.

***Jocelyn Lonen Napa Cabernet Sauvignon, 2004: A wonderful wine at a great QPR (quality / price ratio). Chocolaty, fruit forward, lovely Napa cab. Ripe fruit dominates the nose with elements of café latte and vanilla. Firm, full bodied, nicely integrated and palate coating, this wine can be consumed over the shorter term but will benefit from 12 months in the cellar.

***++Jocelyn Lonen Reserve Cabernet Sauvignon, 2004: Powerful. Brooding. Great mountain fruit elements of briar, blackberry, cassis and chalky minerals. Great structure across the palate. Teeth staining. Firm, furry finish promises rewards for time in the cellar. Very Worthy.

Our second stop was at the other end of the valley – at even higher elevation. Outpost Winery requires a meandering drive up to the peak of Howell Mountain. The views are spectacular – you can actually watch hawks circle below you as they prey upon field animals in the vineyards - and the wines equally so. Thomas Rivers Brown, winemaker to the stars, crafts wonderful wines up here and was kind enough to spend a few hours with us, tasting through nor only the Outpost wines, but barrel sampling the nearly completed Schrader cabs and the new Two Hands bottling. I also took the opportunity to pick up a few bottles of Rivers Marie cabernet from the recent 2004 vintage. I have to say, it is great hanging out with Thomas. He is a rock star in Napa Valley winemaking these days – do yourself a favor and try his recently minted Maybach wines – but down to earth, sincere and earnest in his desire to craft truly exceptional wines. I am a huge fan. Tasted in the beautiful tasting room:

***++Outpost Howell Mountain zinfandel, 2005: Most of you know that I am not a big fan of those balls out, high octane zins. Except this one. Wow. What a sensory experience. I wasn’t sure if I was supposed to drink this or just dab a few drops behind each ear. Powerful, perfumed, dripping with jammy, blackberry and boysenberry preserve, church incense, floral violets, minerals and licorice root. Palate staining but not flabby at all – this is a tour de force of mountain zinfandel. Reminds me of older Sky zins I used to appreciate very much back in the day. A great wine.

***++Outpost Howell Mountain cabernet sauvignon, 2004: Powerful. Black, brambly mountain fruit, with an atypical purity and laser focus. Cassis and generous oak. Lovely integration and depth. Lonnnng finish. Gorgeous.

**+Outpost Howell Mountain Petite Sirah, 2004: Not 100% sure of the vintage. I am not a petite fan – this is nice but not my thing. Deep color, pine needles and blue fruits. Slate and lead pencil notes and a finish that packs a wallop.

To the barrel room we went:

Schrader T6 cabernet sauvignon, 2005: Wow. All of the Schrader wines were lovely and this one was no exception. Thomas mentioned that this was specifically from clone 6 in the To Kalon vineyard and I found it impressive and Paulliac like. Inky, deep, blue and black fruit, chalky minerals. Still closed up but clearly a powerful, stately wine built for the long haul.

Schrader “Old Sparky”, cabernet sauvignon 2005: I believe this is a mix of favorite clones from To Kalon. My personal favorite, this is already very expressive, with beautiful cabernet notes of cassis and black stone fruit, menthol and slate. Wow. Really a beautiful wine.

Schrader CCS cabernet sauvignon, 2005: So pretty – but with a steel backbone. This is a lovely wine that offers more feminine notes of red fruit, loamy earth and a floral, violet element – but again with wonderful structure and great length. Wow.

We did not taste, though I have separate notes, on Thomas Brown’s Rivers Marie pinot noir and cabernet. His Summa vineyard wines are worth seeking out and purchasing – now before there is no way to get them. Thomas is amazingly adept at it seems any and all varietals but, in my humble opinion, pinot noir is his calling.

Our next stop as we made our way back down the valley was Vineyard 29. We have been vineyard 29 fans for many years but had lost touch when the winery changed ownership. Well, the new owners not only have more fully developed the potential of this wonderful winery and vineyard, they have taken it to a brand new level. While the facility itself – and the staff – is amazingly impressive, do not let that take your focus away from the wonderful wines they are crafting there. It is a wonderful stop and the wines show equally well. Having added the Aida vineyard to their estate wine, Vineyard 29 now offers a portfolio of wines that should garner a lot of interest and reinvigorate their brand.


*+Vineyard 29 Cru, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2004: I did not like this wine very much. I found it thick, overcooked a bit and pruney. I believe it comes from a series of vineyards on the Rutherford bench. It is at a lower price point but really not my style of wine.

***Vineyard 29 Aida Red Wine, 1998: This instead was delicious. Still showing that autumnal, almost prune Danish element that is a signature Aida vineyard element, the cabernet fruit added blackberry, cigar tobacco and sois bois to it that made it refined and sophisticated. Very expressive and ready to drink. Very nice.

***Vineyard 29 Aida Red Wine, 2001: A cab / merlot blend (75/25 I think) this wine is also delicious and presenting itself very well today. Red jammy preserves, flowers, clove and that Graves like tobacco and minerals. Very worthy.

**+Vineyard 29, Aida zinfandel, 2003: Again, not my style of zin. For those Turley lovers out there, I am sure this will fire all of your senses. Take the pruney element of Aida and add bright zin berry fruit and you have – a pruney, hot zin! Not a bad wine, just again not what I prize in this varietal.

***+Vineyard 29 estate cabernet sauvignon, 2003: Stately. A lovely, unmistakably Napa styled cabernet sauvignon. Fruit driven, dusty, chalky tannins. Blue fruit on the palate and menthol on the long, furry finish. A beautiful wine. Candidly, way overpriced at $195.

Or final stop was with Tom Garrett, at Revana Winery. I admit to having a bit of a secondary agenda. Of course, we are fans of the Revana and were happy to visit the winery of its own accord. Our hidden motive was to squeeze a taste or two out of Tom’s Detert Family label – offering some of the oldest cab franc vines in the valley! Tom was gracious enough to pour us a little of each.

***+Revana Family cabernet sauvignon, 2004: Unmistakably a Hiedi Barrett cab. All of the tell tale signs. Good extraction, nice balance, rich, varietal fruit notes, new French oak, silky palate feel, big finish. All there. I admittedly could not differentiate this wine from many that have come before it from other wineries and other vineyards made by the same winemaker. Lovely if somewhat expected.

****Detert Family Oakville cabernet franc, 2004: Now we are having fun! A big framed, muscular wine. Delicious, succulent notes of red fruit, powdered valhrona chocolate, grilled meats and violets. Drenching, with endless depth and mineral goodness on the staining palate. This is good stuff, but it needs time.

***+Detert Family Oakville cabernet sauvignon, 2004: Round Two. Another bruiser. Chewy, dense cab fruit flavors, more floral elements and chocolate. Chalky minerals. Long, coating palate with no drop off. Big finish. Somehow more approachable than the franc, perhaps requiring a little less cellar time? Very nice indeed.


Well that was our trip. We very much enjoyed our time in the area and look forward to our next foray. And a few days of sipping beer and mineral water – hiccup!

Saturday, May 19, 2007

Wine Musings LTD: Angwin to Zahtila Day 2

Day two of our Napa trip was not in Napa at all. Instead we spent our time in the Alexander valley, visiting with three wonderful wineries. Alexander valley is becoming a hot spot for dynamite wines and deserves special attention.

Our first stop was at a winery that needs no introduction. The wines of Peter Michael Winery are storied – with no weak links in the offering. Whether we are talking Les Pavots, the various top flight chardonnays or the definitive Apres Midi sauvignon blanc, most of the PMW wines define their categories. Further, they define gracious hospitality. Many thanks to our host Victor Aul for a lovely tour and formal, sit down tasting. If ever the opportunity presents, a visit to PMW should be a focal point of any visit. To the wines:

***++Peter Michael Winery, Après Midi, Sauvignon Blanc, 2005: In my humble opinion, there is no better new world sauvignon blanc. Stunning and rich, possessing varietal qualities of grapefruit, guava and anise but with much more richness and depth than typical. Bright but with a fullness on the palate and a lovely lingering finish. One of the best wines I had all day. Wonderful.

***Peter Michael Winery, La Carriere Estate, Chardonnay, 2005: Lovely. Rich and sophisticated. No surprise that this is very reminiscent of the Aubert chardonnays. Maybe I should say vice versa? Linseed, lemon custard, a touch of sage and candied orange zest on the nose. More of the same with deep minerality and spice on the coating palate. Lovely balance. Long, mineral-y finish. Dynamite.

***+Peter Michael Winery, La Belle Cote Estate, Chardonnay, 2005: A Personal favorite from this chardonnay stable. Brighter, perhaps better suited for aging, this wine reminds me of a dynamite Puligny Montrachet 1st growth. Stately. Bright citrus and orange blossom notes jump from the glass, married to a touch of petrol and a hint of nutmeg. The palate offers more citrus with slate and a touch of vanilla. Lovely and integrated, though a bit more bracing. Good stuff indeed.

***+Peter Michael Winery, Les Pavots, Cabernet Sauvignon, 2004: This wine surprised me a bit. Deep color to the rim, this young, mountain cab is nonetheless effusive from the glass. Notes of black and red berry fruit, church incense and bramble waft right up and assault the sense. Wow. The palate is a bit thick and unctuous, dare I say fat? It offers more black fruit, tar and bakers chocolate. Further along I am disappointed by a somewhat short finish. The wine tips the scales at over 15% alcohol! Almost seems like too much ripeness. I find this wine a bit over the top and I typically expect more from this wine.

Our second stop was Medlock Ames winery. It is nothing short of groovy. The honesty and enthusiasm that just gushes from Ames Morison, as he talks with you about his winery, cannot help but be contagious. Of course it doesn’t hurt that his wines are wonderful and expertly made. For a small winery, they have all the new doo-dads, with a gravity flow system, fancy crusher de-stemmers and stainless steel tanks, a chai that you might think was at Ch Lafite…the works. The big difference is that everything here is organic – down to the sheep and llama that keep the weeds down and the algae that grows on their pond functioning as fertilizer. I won’t rate the wines as they were from the barrel – but I will say that I bought some finished wines and signed up to receive more. This is a wonderful winery that deserves attention and support. We loved the time we spent there.

Medlock Ames Estate Merlot, 2005 (Barrel Sample): Delicious. Black stone fruit driven, with mocha espresso notes and chalky minerals. New french oak adds some vanilla and baking spices. Great depth on the palate and deftly balanced. I’m a buyer.

Medlock Ames Estate Cabernet Sauvignon, 2005 (Barrel Sample): My notes for the cabernet are similar to the merlot, with the addition of cassis fruit notes and a lovely black licorice element. Asian spice. Body is firm and dense, suggesting staying power. Yum.

Our last stop is a favorite: Verite Winery. I have commented on this venue and the wines in the past. They are stand outs from this area. Brian Baker was kind enough not only to meet us at the winery but bring along a bottle of the 2004 Anakota Montana bottling (I think)! All of the Verite wines are outstanding and deserve the accolades they regularly receive.

***++Verite, La Joie, 1998: The wine that started it all for me and still a crowd pleaser. Very bordelaise in style and structure – I would have guessed 1990 Gruaud Larose if pressed. Lovely red and black fruit, herbs and soil elements add complexity and sophistication to this wine. Long and still strong – a wine to savor.

***++Verite La Muse, 1998: Strong out of the gate. Surprisingly firm for a merlot based wine, it still offers up velvety lavender, espresso grind and red fruit notes. The palate offers a molten chocolate essence to accompany the fruit, with grilled meats and herbs. Yum.

**++Verite La Joie, 2000: Perhaps the weakest of the wines presented. Compared to the 01 and 02 versions of this wine, it simply had less stuffing, perhaps even a bit thin mid palate. Black brambly fruit and minerals are offered, if a bit reduced in stature. Finish lingers but does not offer the same level of intensity as the other wines being poured.

***+Verite, La Muse, 2001: Also surprisingly evolved, but still a wonderful mouthful of wine. Chocolate covered berry fruit, grilled meats, a touch of sois bois. Coating and delicious. Long, with firm, drying tannins. Serious.

****Verite La Joie, 2002: A stately wine, if perhaps reserved for cellaring just now. Great depth and harmony of flavor, showing mostly black stone fruit and chalk, pine needles and black licorice. Bottomless. Great Paulliac like in my opinion. Righteous.

****Verite, La Desir, 2002: Lovely and sophisticated. Tar, bramble, smoke and velvety crushed, berry fruit are evoked from this deeply colored, delicious wine. Hard to imagine this improving, but I am sure that it will. Superb integration of new French oak and deft balance. Great now, great later.

**Anakota, Montana, 2004: My first go with this wine. I am not a big fan. A bit over extracted and stewed. Thick licorice flavors and some tar. Almost Amarone like density. Not my cup of tea…or wine.